Qualitative process evaluation of the Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP): study protocol

被引:9
|
作者
Wagstaff, Duncan [1 ,2 ]
Moonesinghe, S. Ramani [1 ,2 ]
Fulop, Naomi J. [3 ]
Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Coll Anaesthetists, Hlth Serv Res Ctr, London, England
[2] UCL, Res Dept Targeted Intervent, Ctr Perioperat Med, London, England
[3] UCL, Dept Appl Hlth Res, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2019年 / 9卷 / 07期
关键词
SURGICAL OUTCOMES; FEEDBACK; AUDIT; CARE; INTERVENTIONS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030214
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction The Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP) is designed to measure complications after major elective surgery and improve these through feedback of data to clinicians. Previous research suggests that despite the significant resources which go into collecting data for national clinical audits, the information they contain is not always used effectively to improve local services. Methods and analysis We will conduct a formative process evaluation of PQIP comprising a multisited qualitative study to analyse PQIPs programme theory, barriers, facilitators and wider contextual factors that influence implementation. The research will be carried out with the PQIP project team and six National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in England, selected according to geographical location, type of hospital, size and level of engagement with PQIP. We will include one Trust which has not expressed interest in the PQIP for comparison and to explore the role of secular trend in any changes in practice. We will use semi-structured interviews (up to 144 in Trusts and 12 with the project team), non-participant observations (up to 150 hours) and documentary analysis. We will track the lifecycle of perioperative data, exploring the transformations it undergoes from creation to use. We will use framework analysis with categories both from our research questions and from themes emerging from the data. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval has been granted from the University College London Research Ethics Committee (ref 10375/001). Permissions to conduct research at NHS Trusts have been granted by local Research and Development offices in coordination with the Health Research Authority. We will follow guidelines for data security, confidentiality and information governance. Findings will be shared at regular time points with the PQIP project team to inform the implementation of the programme, and with participating NHS Trusts to help them reflect on how they currently use data for improvement of perioperative services.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Why is reporting quality improvement so hard? A qualitative study in perioperative care
    Jones, Emma Leanne
    Dixon-Woods, Mary
    Martin, Graham P.
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (07):
  • [2] Interdependencies or integration? A qualitative evaluation of a national emergency department improvement programme
    Jones, Katie
    Rance, Jaynie Y.
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2023, 31 (01) : 49 - 63
  • [3] Increasing the use of perioperative risk scoring in emergency laparotomy: nationwide quality improvement programme
    Nally, Deirdre M.
    Lonergan, Peter E.
    O'Connell, Emer P.
    McNamara, Deborah A.
    BJS OPEN, 2022, 6 (04):
  • [4] Describing methods and interventions: A protocol for the systematic analysis of the perioperative quality improvement literature
    Jones E.
    Lees N.
    Martin G.
    Dixon-Woods M.
    Systematic Reviews, 3 (1)
  • [5] Improving the management of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: systematic evaluation of a quality improvement programme European QUality Improvement Programme for Acute Coronary Syndrome: The EQUIP-ACS project protocol and design
    Flather, Marcus D.
    Booth, Jean
    Babalis, Daphne
    Bueno, Hector
    Steg, Philippe G.
    Opolski, Grzegorz
    Ottani, Filippo
    Machecourt, Jacques
    Bardaji, Alfredo
    Bojestig, Mats
    Brady, Anthony R.
    Lindahl, Bertil
    TRIALS, 2010, 11
  • [6] Peer review in MRI: A quality improvement programme and pilot study
    Paul, J. M.
    Stewart, S. L.
    RADIOGRAPHY, 2021, 27 (02) : 398 - 403
  • [7] Developing and implementing a Digital Stories programme in nursing homes: a qualitative process evaluation
    Stargatt, Jennifer
    Thielking, Monica
    Bhar, Sunil
    AGEING & SOCIETY, 2024,
  • [8] Implementation of the StandingTall programme to prevent falls in older people: a process evaluation protocol
    Taylor, Morag E.
    Todd, Chris
    O'Rourke, Sandra
    Clemson, Lindy M.
    Close, Jacqueline C. T.
    Lord, Stephen R.
    Lung, Thomas
    Berlowitz, David J.
    Blennerhassett, Jannette
    Chow, Jessica
    Dayhew, Julia
    Hawley-Hague, Helen
    Hodge, Wendy
    Howard, Kirsten
    Johnson, Pamela
    Lasrado, Reena
    McInerney, Garth
    Merlene, Marita
    Miles, Lillian
    Said, Catherine M.
    White, Leanne
    Wilson, Nicola
    Zask, Avigdor
    Delbaere, Kim
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (07):
  • [9] Qualitative Research Study of the Calorie Count Process in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients and Identification of Opportunities for Quality Improvement
    Burgess, Lauren
    Bartholomew, Tatiana
    Richards, Rickelle
    Bellini, Sarah Gunnell
    TOPICS IN CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2020, 35 (04) : 287 - 298
  • [10] SWOT analysis of a pediatric rehabilitation programme: A participatory evaluation fostering quality improvement
    Camden, Chantal
    Swaine, Bonnie
    Tetreault, Sylvie
    Bergeron, Sophie
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2009, 31 (16) : 1373 - 1381