English, Tracking, and Neoliberalization of Education in South Korea

被引:21
作者
Byean, Hyera [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, TESL Program, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
关键词
LANGUAGE; GLOBALIZATION; ACHIEVEMENT; INSTRUCTION; TEACHERS; STUDENTS; SCHOOLS; ABROAD;
D O I
10.1002/tesq.257
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Drawing upon the experiences and dilemmas of the author, a middle school English teacher in South Korea, this article illuminates the ways in which neoliberal reforms in education intersect with English, and how such links have entailed the class-based polarization of education in Korean society. Given the prominent role that English plays in neoliberal policies-namely, serving as a direct index of elite schools and track placement-unequal access to English across the class spectrum restricts the prospects of disadvantaged students in the neoliberal education market. Tracking is one way in which this unequal access is manifest in the Korean educational landscape. Tracking refers to placing students in accordance with their academic abilities in order to tailor instruction to best meet students' needs (Oakes, 1985). Contrary to its intended purpose, however, tracking has been vehemently criticized for exacerbating educational inequalities (Gamoran, 2010; Hallam & Ireson, 2005; Oakes, 1985; Oakes, Gamoran, & Page, 1992). By locating the tracking policy against the backdrop of the local significance of English, this article identifies hidden agendas underlying tracking practices surrounding English, and further highlights how the interplay of English and neoliberalism mediates relations of class and inequality while justifying policies and practices surrounding English as the imperatives of globalization.
引用
收藏
页码:867 / 882
页数:16
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   College rank and neo-liberal subjectivity in South Korea: the burden of self-development [J].
Abelmann, Nancy ;
Park, So Jin ;
Kim, Hyunhee .
INTER-ASIA CULTURAL STUDIES, 2009, 10 (02) :229-247
[2]  
Anderson L, 2014, BIG LIES OF SCHOOL REFORM: FINDING BETTER SOLUTIONS FOR THE FUTURE OF PUBLIC EDUCATION, P109
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, THESIS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, S KOR BE EX ONC AG F
[5]  
Appadurai Arjun., 1996, MODERNITY LARGE
[6]   Comparing neo-liberal projects and inequality in education [J].
Apple, MW .
COMPARATIVE EDUCATION, 2001, 37 (04) :409-423
[7]  
Atkinson D., 2011, companion to discourse analysis, P85
[8]  
Auerbach E., 2000, The sociopolitics of English language teaching, P143
[9]   REEXAMINING ENGLISH ONLY IN THE ESL CLASSROOM [J].
AUERBACH, ER .
TESOL QUARTERLY, 1993, 27 (01) :9-32
[10]  
Benesch S., 1991, ESL in American myths and possibilities, P59