Defining Low Prognosis Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology: POSEIDON Criteria-The Why

被引:93
|
作者
Esteves, Sandro C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Roque, Matheus [4 ]
Bedoschi, Giuliano M. [5 ]
Conforti, Alessandro [6 ]
Humaidan, Peter [3 ,7 ]
Alviggi, Carlo [6 ]
机构
[1] ANDROFERT, Androl & Human Reprod Clin, Campinas, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, Dept Surg, UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil
[3] Aarhus Univ, Fac Hlth, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] ORIGEN, Ctr Reprod Med, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[5] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Div Reprod Med, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
[6] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Neurosci Reprod Sci & Odontostomat, Naples, Italy
[7] Skive Reg Hosp, Fertil Clin, Skive, Denmark
来源
FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY | 2018年 / 9卷
关键词
assisted reproductive technology; hypo-responder; low responder; ovarian stimulation; poor ovarian response; poor ovarian reserve; POSEIDON criteria; IN-VITRO-FERTILIZATION; POOR OVARIAN RESPONDERS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; LIVE BIRTH-RATES; FOLLICLE-STIMULATING-HORMONE; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; GNRH AGONIST PROTOCOL; OUTPUT RATE FORT; BOLOGNA CRITERIA; EMBRYO-TRANSFER;
D O I
10.3389/fendo.2018.00461
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Women with impaired ovarian reserve or poor ovarian response (POR) to exogenous gonadotropin stimulation present a challenge for reproductive specialists. The primary reasons relate to the still limited knowledge about the POR pathophysiology and the lack of practical solutions for the management of these conditions. Indeed, clinical trials using the current standards to define POR failed to show evidence in favor of a particular treatment modality. Furthermore, critical factors for reproductive success, such as the age-dependent embryo aneuploidy rates and the intrinsic ovarian resistance to gonadotropin stimulation, are not taken into consideration by the current POR criteria. As a result, the accepted definitions for POR have been criticized for their inadequacy concerning the proper patient characterization and for not providing clinicians a guide for therapeutic management. A novel system to classify infertility patients with "expected" or "unexpected" inappropriate ovarian response to exogenous gonadotropins-the POSEIDON criteria -was developed to provide a more nuanced picture of POR and to guide physicians in the management of such patients. The new standards are provoking as they challenge the current terminology of POR in favor of the newly defined concept of "low prognosis." This article provides readers a critical appraisal of the existing criteria that standardize the definition of POR and explains the primary reasons for the development of the POSEIDON criteria.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Low Prognosis by the POSEIDON Criteria in Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Multicenter and Multinational Prevalence Study of Over 13,000 Patients
    Esteves, Sandro C.
    Yarali, Hakan
    Vuong, Lan N.
    Carvalho, Jose F.
    Ozbek, Irem Y.
    Polat, Mehtap
    Le, Ho L.
    Pham, Toan D.
    Ho, Tuong M.
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [2] Editorial: POSEIDON's Stratification of 'Low Prognosis' Patients in ART: The WHY, the WHAT, and the HOW
    Esteves, Sandro C.
    Andersen, Claus Yding
    Fischer, Robert
    Humaidan, Peter
    Alviggi, Carlo
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [3] Growth Hormone Cotreatment for Low-Prognosis Patients According to the POSEIDON Criteria
    Liu, Xueying
    Xu, Jingxiao
    Bi, Lixin
    Liu, Peihao
    Jiao, Xue
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [4] Patients with low prognosis in ART: a Delphi consensus to identify potential clinical implications and measure the impact of POSEIDON criteria
    Alviggi, Carlo
    Humaidan, Peter
    Fischer, Robert
    Conforti, Alessandro
    Dahan, Michael H.
    Marca, Antonio La
    Orvieto, Raoul
    Polyzos, Nikolaos P.
    Roque, Matheus
    Sunkara, Sesh K.
    Ubaldi, Filippo Maria
    Vuong, Lan
    Yarali, Hakan
    D'Hooghe, Thomas
    Longobardi, Salvatore
    Esteves, Sandro C.
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 22 (01)
  • [5] High prevalence of low prognosis by the POSEIDON criteria in women undergoing planned oocyte cryopreservation
    Horowitz, Eran
    Mizrachi, Yossi
    Barber, Elad
    Shimshy, Miriam
    Levitas-Djerbi, Talia
    Finkelstein, Maya
    Shalev, Amir
    Farhi, Jacob
    Raziel, Arieh
    Esteves, Sandro C.
    Weissman, Ariel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 295 : 42 - 47
  • [6] Comparison of miscarriage rates in low prognosis patients according to the POSEIDON criteria
    Hsiao, Yu-Yang
    Tsai, Ni-Chin
    Su, Yu-Ting
    Lin, Yu-Ju
    Chiang, Hsin-Ju
    Kung, Fu-Tsai
    Lan, Kuo-Chung
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 63 (02): : 199 - 204
  • [7] Euploidy rates of embryos in young patients with good and low prognosis according to the POSEIDON criteria
    Karlikaya, Guvenc
    Boynukalin, Fazilet Kubra
    Gultomruk, Meral
    Kavrut, Mustecep
    Abali, Remzi
    Demir, Berfu
    Ecemis, Selen
    Yarkiner, Zalihe
    Bahceci, Mustafa
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2021, 42 (04) : 733 - 741
  • [8] Live birth rates of low prognosis patients according to POSEIDON criteria; A retrospective cohort study
    Seven, Banu
    Gulerman, Cavidan
    Ozgu-Erdinc, A. Seval
    Yilmaz, Nafiye
    Engin-Ustun, Yaprak
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 49 (07)
  • [9] Blastocyst euploidy rates in low-prognosis patients according to the POSEIDON criteria: a retrospective analysis of 3016 embryos
    Luo, Mingyue
    Li, Duan
    Xia, Mingdi
    Xie, Hongqiang
    Liu, Peihao
    Qin, Yingying
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2022, 44 (02) : 247 - 253
  • [10] Effect of follicular flushing on reproductive outcomes in patients with poor ovarian response undergoing assisted reproductive technology
    Souza, Anna L. M.
    Sampaio, Marcos
    Noronha, Graciele B.
    Coster, Ludiana G. R.
    de Oliveira, Roberta S. G.
    Geber, Selmo
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2017, 34 (10) : 1353 - 1357