A Review and Comparison of the Reliabilities of the MMPI-2, MCMI-III, and PAI Presented in Their Respective Test Manuals

被引：13

作者：

Wise, Edward A. ^{[1
]}

Streiner, David L. ^{[2
]}

Walfish, Steven

机构：

[1] PLLC, Mental Hlth Resources, Memphis, TN USA

[2] Univ Toronto, Baycrest Ctr, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada

来源：

MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT | 2010年 / 42卷 / 04期

关键词：

MMPI-2; MCMI-III; PAI; Reliability; COEFFICIENT ALPHA; BARIATRIC SURGERY; CANDIDATES;

D O I：

10.1177/0748175609354594

中图分类号：

G44 [教育心理学];

学科分类号：

0402 ; 040202 ;

摘要：

This article provides a review of the literature to determine the most frequently used personality tests. Based on this review, internal consistency and test-retest reliability coefficients from the test manuals for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2), Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III), and Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) are reported. A summary of the strengths and weaknesses of the reliability estimates for each of the tests is provided.

引用

页码：246 / 254

页数：9

共 28 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 1999, STAND ED PSYCH TEST

[2]

[Anonymous], MILLON CLIN MULTIAXI

[3] A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists [J].