Fentanyl Sublingual Tablets Versus Subcutaneous Morphine for the Management of Severe Cancer Pain Episodes in Patients Receiving Opioid Treatment: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial

被引:18
作者
Zecca, Ernesto [1 ]
Brunelli, Cinzia [1 ,2 ]
Centurioni, Fabio [1 ]
Manzoni, Andrea [1 ]
Pigni, Alessandra [1 ]
Caraceni, Augusto [1 ]
机构
[1] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori, Milan, Italy
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
BREAKTHROUGH PAIN; ORAL MORPHINE; TRANSMUCOSAL FENTANYL; INTRAVENOUS MORPHINE; CLINICAL-TRIAL; BUCCAL TABLET; PHARMACOKINETICS; EFFICACY; REGIMEN; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9504
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Fentanyl sublingual tablets (FST) are a potentially useful alternative to parenteral opioids such as subcutaneous morphine (SCM) to treat severe cancer pain episodes. No direct comparison between FST and SCM is available. The aim of this study was to test noninferiority of FST versus SCM during the first 30 min postadministration. Methods Patients receiving stable opioid therapy and experiencing a severe pain episode were randomly assigned to either 100 mg FST or 5 mg SCM in a double-blind, double-dummy trial. Average pain intensity (PI) assessed on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale at 10, 20, and 30 min postadministration was the main end point. Analysis of covariance, adjusted by baseline PI, was the main analysis. The noninferiority margin (NIm) for the between-group difference was set at 20.6, that is, equal to one third of the minimum clinically important PI difference of two points. Results A total of 114 patients were randomly assigned to either FST (n = 58) or SCM (n = 56). One patient (in the FST group) withdrew consent before drug administration and was excluded from analysis. Baseline mean PIs were 7.5 in both groups; mean average PIs assessed at 10, 20, and 30 min postadministration were 5.0 and 4.5 for FST and SCM, respectively, with the 95% CI of the between-group difference including the NIm (-0.49; 95% CI, -1.10 to 0.09). Patients taking FST received a second drug dose after 30 min more frequently than did patients taking SCM (51% v 37%, respectively; risk difference, -13%; 95% CI, -30% to 3%). Both treatments were well tolerated, with average follow-up adverse event scores below the response of "A Little." Ninety-three percent of patients preferred the sublingual administration. Conclusion This trial did not show noninferiority of FST versus SCM within the chosen NIm. Both treatments were safe, and patients preferred the sublingual route of administration. FST provides analgesia with modest to moderate increased risk of lower efficacy compared with SCM. (C) 2017 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:759 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Eszopiclone for the Treatment of Insomnia in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain [J].
Goforth, Harold W. ;
Preud'homme, Xavier A. ;
Krystal, Andrew D. .
SLEEP, 2014, 37 (06) :1053-1060
[42]   Fentanyl buccal tablet for the relief of breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant adult patients with chronic neuropathic pain: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study [J].
Simpson, David M. ;
Messina, John ;
Xie, Fang ;
Hale, Martin .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 29 (04) :588-601
[43]   Atomized Intranasal Ketorolac Versus Intravenous Ketorolac for the Treatment of Severe Renal Colic in the Emergency Department: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Al-Khalasi, Usama Said Shannan ;
Al-Alalawi, Awatif Khamis Said Al-Sarrai ;
Al-Jufaili, Mahmood ;
Al-Reesi, Abdullah ;
Al-Zakwani, Ibrahim ;
Al-Asmi, Muzna Said Rashid ;
Al-Riyami, Fatma Bader ;
Vishwakarma, Ramesh .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 83 (03) :217-224
[44]   A comparative study of intranasal desmopressin and intranasal ketamine for pain management in renal colic patients: a randomized double-blind clinical trial [J].
Heydari, Farhad ;
Azizkhani, Reza ;
Majidinejad, Saeed ;
Zamani, Majid ;
Norouzian, Aref .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 11 (01) :51-58
[45]   Comparison of the pain-killing effects of leech therapy versus physiotherapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A double-blind randomized clinical trial [J].
Talebi, Seyed Saman ;
Roudsari, Ahmad Tahamoli ;
Zolhavarieh, Seyed Mohammad ;
Majidi, Lobat ;
Ghiasi, Hossein ;
Poorolajal, Jalal ;
Vafaei, Seyed Alireza .
BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2022, 9 (06) :5094-5100
[46]   Low-dose l-isoproterenol versus salbutamol in hospitalized pediatric patients with severe acute exacerbation of asthma: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial [J].
Katsunuma, Toshio ;
Fujisawa, Takao ;
Maekawa, Takanobu ;
Akashi, Kenichi ;
Ohya, Yukihiro ;
Adachi, Yuichi ;
Hashimoto, Koji ;
Mizuno, Mihoko ;
Imai, Takanori ;
Oba, Mari S. ;
Sako, Mayumi ;
Ohashi, Yasuo ;
Nakamura, Hidefumi .
ALLERGOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 68 (03) :335-341
[47]   Subcutaneous methylnaltrexone for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation in patients with advanced illness: A double-blind, randomized, parallel group, dose-ranging study [J].
Portenoy, Russell K. ;
Thomas, Jay ;
Boatwright, Michele L. Moehl ;
Tran, Diep ;
Galasso, Frank L. ;
Stambler, Nancy ;
Von Gunten, Charles F. ;
Israel, Robert J. .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2008, 35 (05) :458-468
[48]   Transforaminal Versus Lateral Parasagittal Versus Midline Interlaminar Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection for Management of Unilateral Radicular Lumbar Pain: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial [J].
Makkar, Jeetinder Kaur ;
Gourav, Kalla Krishna Prasad ;
Jain, Kajal ;
Singh, Preet Mohinder ;
Dhatt, Sarvdeep S. ;
Sachdeva, Naresh ;
Bhadada, Sanjay .
PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2019, 22 (06) :561-573
[49]   Intravenous acetaminophen does not reduce morphine use for pain relief in emergency department patients: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial [J].
Minotti, Bruno ;
Mansella, Gregory ;
Sieber, Robert ;
Ott, Alexander ;
Nickel, Christian H. ;
Bingisser, Roland .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 29 (08) :954-962
[50]   A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Radiofrequency Versus Laser Treatment of the Great Saphenous Vein in Patients With Varicose Veins [J].
Nordon, Ian M. ;
Hinchliffe, Robert J. ;
Brar, Ranjeet ;
Moxey, Paul ;
Black, Steve A. ;
Thompson, Matt M. ;
Loftus, Ian M. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2011, 254 (06) :876-881