Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Using Clinical Models and 77 Independent Risk-Associated SNPs for Women Aged Under 50 Years: Australian Breast Cancer Family Registry

被引:89
作者
Dite, Gillian S. [1 ]
MacInnis, Robert J. [1 ,2 ]
Bickerstaffe, Adrian [1 ]
Dowty, James G. [1 ]
Allman, Richard [3 ]
Apicella, Carmel [1 ]
Milne, Roger L. [1 ,2 ]
Tsimiklis, Helen [4 ]
Phillips, Kelly-Anne [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Giles, Graham G. [1 ,2 ]
Terry, Mary Beth [7 ]
Southey, Melissa C. [4 ]
Hopper, John L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Epidemiol & Biostat, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Canc Council Victoria, Canc Epidemiol Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Genet Technol Ltd, Fitzroy, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Dept Pathol, Genet Epidemiol Lab, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[5] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Div Canc Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Melbourne, Sir Peter MacCallum Dept Oncol, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[7] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, New York, NY USA
基金
加拿大健康研究院; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
GENETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; BOADICEA MODEL; PROBABILITIES; PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION; GENOTYPES; ACCURACY; HISTORY; IMPROVE; BRCA1;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0838
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The extent to which clinical breast cancer risk prediction models can be improved by including information on known susceptibility SNPs is not known. Methods: Using 750 cases and 405 controls from the population-based Australian Breast Cancer Family Registry who were younger than 50 years at diagnosis and recruitment, respectively, Caucasian and not BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers, we derived absolute 5-year risks of breast cancer using the BOADICEA, BRCAPRO, BCRAT, and IBIS risk prediction models and combined these with a risk score based on 77 independent risk-associated SNPs. We used logistic regression to estimate the OR per adjusted SD for log-transformed age-adjusted 5-year risks. Discrimination was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Calibration was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. We also constructed reclassification tables and calculated the net reclassification improvement. Results: The ORs for BOADICEA, BRCAPRO, BCRAT, and IBIS were 1.80, 1.75, 1.67, and 1.30, respectively. When combined with the SNP-based score, the corresponding ORs were 1.96, 1.89, 1.80, and 1.52. The corresponding AUCs were 0.66, 0.65, 0.64, and 0.57 for the risk prediction models, and 0.70, 0.69, 0.66, and 0.63 when combined with the SNP-based score. Conclusions: By combining a 77 SNP-based score with clinical models, the AUC for predicting breast cancer before age 50 years improved by >20%. Impact: Our estimates of the increased performance of clinical risk prediction models from including genetic information could be used to inform targeted screening and prevention. (C) 2015 AACR.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 365
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Evaluation of breast cancer risk assessment packages in the family history evaluation and screening programme [J].
Amir, E ;
Evans, DG ;
Shenton, A ;
Lalloo, F ;
Moran, A ;
Boggis, C ;
Wilson, M ;
Howell, A .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2003, 40 (11) :807-814
[2]   Assessing Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer: A Review of Risk Assessment Models [J].
Amir, Eitan ;
Freedman, Orit C. ;
Seruga, Bostjan ;
Evans, D. Gareth .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2010, 102 (10) :680-691
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Stata Statistical Software Release 9
[4]   The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers: updates and extensions [J].
Antoniou, A. C. ;
Cunningham, A. P. ;
Peto, J. ;
Evans, D. G. ;
Lalloo, F. ;
Narod, S. A. ;
Risch, H. A. ;
Eyfjord, J. E. ;
Hopper, J. L. ;
Southey, M. C. ;
Olsson, H. ;
Johannsson, O. ;
Borg, A. ;
Passini, B. ;
Radice, P. ;
Manoukian, S. ;
Eccles, D. M. ;
Tang, N. ;
Olah, E. ;
Anton-Culver, H. ;
Warner, E. ;
Lubinski, J. ;
Gronwald, J. ;
Gorski, B. ;
Tryggvadottir, L. ;
Syrjakoski, K. ;
Kallioniemi, O-P ;
Eerola, H. ;
Nevanlinna, H. ;
Pharoah, P. D. P. ;
Easton, D. F. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 98 (08) :1457-1466
[5]   The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer [J].
Antoniou, AC ;
Pharoah, PPD ;
Smith, P ;
Easton, DF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 91 (08) :1580-1590
[6]   Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography [J].
Barlow, William E. ;
White, Emily ;
Ballard-Barbash, Rachel ;
Vacek, Pamela M. ;
Titus-Ernstoff, Linda ;
Carney, Patricia A. ;
Tice, Jeffrey A. ;
Buist, Diana S. M. ;
Geller, Berta M. ;
Rosenberg, Robert ;
Yankaskas, Bonnie C. ;
Kerlikowske, Karla .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (17) :1204-1214
[7]   Distribution of breast cancer risk from SNPs and classical risk factors in women of routine screening age in the UK [J].
Brentnall, A. R. ;
Evans, D. G. ;
Cuzick, J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 110 (03) :827-828
[8]  
Brentnall AR, 2013, J GENET SYNDR GENE T, V4, P202
[9]   Projecting absolute invasive breast cancer risk in white women with a model that includes mammographic density [J].
Chen, Jinbo ;
Pee, David ;
Ayyagari, Rajeev ;
Graubard, Barry ;
Schairer, Catherine ;
Byrne, Celia ;
Benichou, Jacques ;
Gail, Mitchell H. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (17) :1215-1226
[10]  
Chen S., 2004, STAT APPL GENET MOL, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.2202/1544-6115.1063