Application of a biphasic macroporous synthetic bone substitutes CERAFORMA®: clinical and histological results

被引:18
作者
Botez, P. [2 ]
Sirbu, P. [1 ]
Simion, L. [1 ]
Munteanu, Fl. [2 ]
Antoniac, I. [3 ]
机构
[1] Gr T Popa Univ Med & Pharm, Fac Gen Med, Iasi 700115, Romania
[2] Gr T Popa Univ Med & Pharm, Fac Bioengn, Iasi 700115, Romania
[3] Univ Politehn Bucuresti, Bucharest 060042, Romania
关键词
Bone graft; Synthetic bone substitute; Biphasic phosphocalcic ceramic; PHOSPHATE; SITE; INGROWTH;
D O I
10.1007/s00590-009-0445-7
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Missing bone is a challenging situation in orthopaedic surgery. Due to specific chemical and structural properties, biphasic ceramics are used as bone substitutes. We investigated intraoperative manoeuvrability, clinical tolerability, radiological and histological integration of a biphasic synthetic ceramic (CERAFORM(A (R))). Present study reports 5-year follow-up of 43 cases requiring bone substitution: bone tumours; spinal fusions; revision arthroplasty; nonunions; fractures; osteitis. GESTO (Greffes ET Substitutes Tissulaires en Orthopedie) patient form was used for evaluation and follow up. Radiological survey was performed at 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months. We used CERAFORM(A (R)) as single substitute or mixed with allo- or autograft. Clinical and radiological integration occurred 9-12 months after implantation. Bone biopsy documented new bone formation. CERAFORM allows good filling of the defect, additional autograft or osteosynthesis is needed for higher mechanical stability. Radiological aspect after implantation stands for a rapid integration in the host bone. Histological examination confirmed bone remodelling.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 395
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
AUGEREAU B, 1993, TUMEURS OSSEUSES APP
[2]  
BOTEZ P, 2002, 8 C ALOF BUCH
[3]  
BURCHARDT H, 1983, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P28
[4]   ANEURYSMAL BONE-CYST OF THE SPINE [J].
CAPANNA, R ;
ALBISINNI, U ;
PICCI, P ;
CALDERONI, P ;
CAMPANACCI, M ;
SPRINGFIELD, DS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1985, 67A (04) :527-531
[5]  
*CERAFORM, 2005, TECHN DESCR SUBST OS
[6]  
DACULSI G, 1989, REV CHIR ORTHOP, V75, P65
[7]  
DACULSI G, 1990, BIOMATERIALS, V11, P86
[8]  
DACULSI G, 1996, BIOMATERIAUX SUBSTIT, P5
[9]   A synthetic porous ceramic as a bone graft substitute in the surgical management of scoliosis -: A prospective, randomized study [J].
Delécrin, J ;
Takahashi, S ;
Gouin, F ;
Passuti, N .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (05) :563-569
[10]  
Delloye C, 2003, Acta Orthop Belg, V69, P1