Effect of Humic/Fulvic Acid in Beef Cattle Finishing Diets on Animal Performance, Ruminal Ammonia and Serum Urea Nitrogen Concentration

被引:24
作者
McMurphy, C. P. [1 ]
Duff, G. C. [1 ]
Harris, M. A. [1 ]
Sanders, S. R. [1 ]
Chirase, N. K. [2 ]
Bailey, C. R. [1 ]
Ibrahim, R. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Anim Sci, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] CAPS Inc, Amarillo, TX 79109 USA
关键词
Beef cattle; humate; humic/fulvic acid; SUPPLEMENTATION; HUMATE;
D O I
10.1080/09712119.2009.9706995
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This study was designed to investigate the effects of a humate supplement on rumen ammonia N (RAN), serum urea N (SUN) and live performance in beef cattle finishing diets. Twenty-four English cross steers (BW 432 +/- 5 kg) were stratified by weight, randomly assigned to individual pens and fed one of the four diets, containing 0 (control), 0.5, 1.0 or 1.5% humic/fulvic acid, for 56 d. Control diets contained 33.3 mg/kg monensin. Steers were weighed at d 0, 28 and 56. Blood (jugular veni-puncture) samples and rumen (esophageal tube) samples were taken prior to feeding on d 0 and there after prior to and 4 h post feeding on d 28 and 56. Rumen fluid pH was determined immediately, acidified with HCl and stored (-20c) for subsequent RAN analysis. Serum was also stored (-20C) for analysis of SUN. During the 56 d period there was no difference in DMI (P > 0.58), ADG (P > 0.24) or GY (P > 0.28) between treatments. There were no two or three way interactions for SUN (P > 0.95), RAN (P > 0.87) or rumen pH (P > 0.15). There was a tendency for a cubic response (P < 0.10) for RAN and SUN, however, no biological significance could be determined. These results suggest that humic/fulvic acid does not affect DMI, ADG, GY, SUN, RAN and pH in finishing steers when compared to those fed monensin.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 100
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] AUTOMATED SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF AMMONIA AND TOTAL AMINO-ACIDS IN RUMINAL FLUID AND INVITRO MEDIA
    BRODERICK, GA
    KANG, JH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1980, 63 (01) : 64 - 75
  • [2] CHIRASE NK, 2000, P W SEC AM SOC ANIM, V51, P415
  • [3] Galyean M.L., 1997, LAB PROCEDURES ANIMA
  • [4] Efficacy of ionophores in cattle diets for mitigation of enteric methane
    Guan, H.
    Wittenberg, K. M.
    Ominski, K. H.
    Krause, D. O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2006, 84 (07) : 1896 - 1906
  • [5] The effects of dietary humate supplementation on broiler growth and carcass yield
    Kocabagli, N
    Alp, M
    Acar, N
    Kahraman, R
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 2002, 81 (02) : 227 - 230
  • [6] LUSK JL, 2000, AM AGR EC ASS ANN M
  • [7] *SAS INST INC, 1988, SAS US GUID STAT
  • [8] Sawyer J. E., 2003, Professional Animal Scientist, V19, P188
  • [9] Shi Y, 2001, T ASAE, V44, P677
  • [10] The effects of supplementation of humate and probiotic on egg production and quality parameters during the late laying period in hens
    Yörük, MA
    Gül, M
    Hayirli, A
    Macit, M
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 2004, 83 (01) : 84 - 88