Matrix logarithms and range of the exponential maps for the symmetry groups SL(2, R), SL(2, C), and the Lorentz group

被引:4
作者
Qiao, Zhiqian [1 ]
Dick, Rainer [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Phys & Engn Phys, 116 Sci Pl, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E2, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS | 2019年 / 3卷 / 07期
关键词
Lie groups; Lie algebras; Lorentz group; ROTATION MATRIX;
D O I
10.1088/2399-6528/ab31da
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Physicists know that covering the continuously connected component L-+(up arrow) of the Lorentz group can be achieved through two Lie algebra exponentials, whereas one exponential is sufficient for compact symmetry groups like SU(N) or SO(N). On the other hand, both the general Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula for the combination of matrix exponentials in a series of higher order commutators, and the possibility to define the logarithm ln ((M) under bar) of a general matrix (M) under bar through the Jordan normal form, seem to naively suggest that even for non-compact groups a single exponential should be sufficient. We provide explicit constructions of ln ((M) under bar) for all matrices M in the fundamental representations of the non-compact groups SL (2, R), SL (2, C), and SO(1, 2). The construction for SL (2, C) also yields logarithms for SO(1, 3) through the spinor representations. However, it is well known that single Lie algebra exponentials are not sufficient to cover the Lie groups SL (2, R) and SL (2, C). Therefore we revisit the maximal neighbourhoods N-1 subset of SL (2, R) and N-1,(C) subset of SL (2, C) which can be covered through single exponentials exp((X) under bar) with X is an element of sl (2, R) or (X) under bar is an element of Sl (2, C), respectively, to clarify why ln ((M) under bar) is not an element of sl (2, R) or ln ((M) under bar) is not an element of sl (2, C) outside of the corresponding domains N-1 or N-1(,) (C). On the other hand, for the Lorentz groups SO(1, 2) and SO(1, 3), we confirm through construction of the logarithm ln ((Lambda) under bar) that every transformation (Lambda) under bar in the connectivity component L-+(up arrow) of the identity element can be represented in the form exp(X) with (X) under bar is an element of so (1, 2) or (X) under bar is an element of so (1, 3), respectively. We also examine why the proper orthochronous Lorentz group can be covered by single Lie algebra exponentials, whereas this property does not hold for its covering group SL (2, C): The logarithms ln ((Lambda) under bar) in L-+(up arrow) correspond to logarithms on the first sheet of the covering map SL (2, C) -> L-+(up arrow), which is contained in N-1(, C). The special linear groups and the Lorentz group therefore provide instructive examples for different global behaviour of non-compact Lie groups under the exponential map.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Functions of matrices
[2]  
Barut A O., 1986, Theory of Group Representations and Applications
[3]  
Cornwell J. F., 1984, Group Theory in Physics, VII
[4]  
Dick R., 2016, Advanced Quantum Mechanics: Materials and Photons, V2nd
[5]   Exponentiation of the spinor representation of the Lorentz group [J].
Fredsted, J .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 42 (09) :4497-4502
[6]  
Gantmacher F. R., 1959, The theory of matrices, V1
[7]  
Gilmore R, 2008, LIE GROUPS, PHYSICS, AND GEOMETRY, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511791390
[8]  
Gilmore R., 1974, Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Some of Their Applications
[9]  
Helgason S., 1978, PURE APPL MATH, V80
[10]   A COMMENT ON "ON THE ROTATION MATRIX IN MINKOWSKI SPACE-TIME" BY OZDEMIR AND ERDOGDU [J].
Jadczyk, Arkadiusz ;
Szulga, Jerzy .
REPORTS ON MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 74 (01) :39-44