International consensus statement on the assessment of interprofessional learning outcomes

被引:87
作者
Rogers, Gary D. [1 ,2 ]
Thistlethwaite, Jill E. [3 ]
Anderson, Elizabeth S. [4 ]
Dahlgren, Madeleine Abrandt [5 ]
Grymonpre, Ruby E. [6 ]
Moran, Monica [7 ]
Samarasekera, Dujeepa D. [8 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Sch Med, G40 8-75 Gold Coast Campus, Gold Coast, Qld 4222, Australia
[2] Hlth Inst Dev Educ & Scholarship Hlth IDEAS, Gold Coast, Australia
[3] Univ Technol, Sch Commun, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Leicester, Dept Med Educ, Leicester, Leics, England
[5] Linkoping Univ, Dept Med & Hlth Sci, Linkoping, Sweden
[6] Univ Manitoba, Coll Pharm, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[7] Cent Queensland Univ, Sch Human Hlth & Social Sci, Rockhampton, Qld, Australia
[8] Natl Univ Singapore, Ctr Med Educ CenMED, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; COMPLEXITY SCIENCE; COMPETENCE; STUDENTS; TEAMWORK; FEEDBACK; TEAMS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/0142159X.2017.1270441
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Regulatory frameworks around the world mandate that health and social care professional education programs graduate practitioners who have the competence and capability to practice effectively in interprofessional collaborative teams. Academic institutions are responding by offering interprofessional education (IPE); however, there is as yet no consensus regarding optimal strategies for the assessment of interprofessional learning (IPL). The Program Committee for the 17th Ottawa Conference in Perth, Australia in March, 2016, invited IPE champions to debate and discuss the current status of the assessment of IPL. A draft statement from this workshop was further discussed at the global All Together Better Health VIII conference in Oxford, UK in September, 2016. The outcomes of these deliberations and a final round of electronic consultation informed the work of a core group of international IPE leaders to develop this document. The consensus statement we present here is the result of the synthesized views of experts and global colleagues. It outlines the challenges and difficulties but endorses a set of desired learning outcome categories and methods of assessment that can be adapted to individual contexts and resources. The points of consensus focus on pre-qualification (pre-licensure) health professional students but may be transferable into post-qualification arenas.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 359
页数:13
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]   The Leicester Model of Interprofessional Education: Developing, delivering and learning from student voices for 10 years [J].
Anderson, Elizabeth S. ;
Lennox, Angela .
JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2009, 23 (06) :557-573
[2]   Students improve patient care and prepare for professional practice: An interprofessional community-based study [J].
Anderson, Elizabeth Susan ;
Thorpe, Lucy Nichola .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2014, 36 (06) :495-504
[3]   Learning to listen: Improving students' communication with disabled people [J].
Anderson, Elizabeth Susan ;
Ford, Jenny ;
Thorpe, Lucy .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2011, 33 (01) :44-52
[4]  
[Anonymous], ALL TOG BETT HLTH 8
[5]  
[Anonymous], WALK NHS EPORTFOLIO
[6]  
[Anonymous], CURR REN INT ED HLTH
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, LEADERSHIP DEV INTER
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2014, LEADERSHIP DEV INTER, DOI DOI 10.1057/9781137363022_10
[9]  
[Anonymous], FRAM COMP
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2016, FUT MED ED CAN FMEC