Energy Performance Certificates and Historic Apartment Buildings: A Method to Encourage User Participation and Sustainability in the Refurbishment Process

被引:12
作者
Berg, Fredrik [1 ]
Donarelli, Anna [2 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Inst Cultural Heritage Res NIKU, Dept Bldg, Oslo, Norway
[2] Uppsala Univ, Dept Art Hist Conservat, Visby, Sweden
关键词
Historic buildings; energy efficiency; apartment; energy performance certificate; user participation; cultural heritage; building conservation; Norway; Sweden; EFFICIENCY; FEEDBACK; RETROFITS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1080/17567505.2019.1592836
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This article presents and discusses the challenges of refurbishing historic apartment buildings by correlating findings from research projects LEAF and CulClim. Our aim is to shed light on how residents can partake in and optimise the refurbishment process after energy performance certificates (EPC) have been conducted. The background is that historic apartment buildings are generally more complex than single family buildings with respect to the energy efficiency process as they often have multiple owners with different priorities. The case studies from Norway and Sweden have conceptually contrasting energy performance certificate (EPC) systems. Identified advantages and shortcomings concerning both systems are discussed. In Sweden, the restrained recommendation of measures can lead to national mitigation targets not being realised. In Norway, excessive and unqualified recommendations risk reducing the cultural heritage values of the existing building stock as well as having a negative environmental impact on greenhouse gas emissions. A bottom-up approach incorporating the resident's objectives is presented and discussed. Results suggest that improved EPC-systems and a broadened procedural approach to decision making will ease the process and improve the outcome of the refurbishment with respect to both energy and heritage aspects.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 240
页数:17
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, CLIM CULT FIN REP SU
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ICS 9112010 97195
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, EN REF HIST BUILD BA
[4]   Extending the energy efficiency gap [J].
Backlund, Sandra ;
Thollander, Patrik ;
Palm, Jenny ;
Ottosson, Mikael .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 51 :392-396
[5]   User-driven energy efficiency in historic buildings: A review [J].
Berg, Fredrik ;
Flyen, Anne-Cathrine ;
Godbolt, Asne Lund ;
Brostrom, Tor .
JOURNAL OF CULTURAL HERITAGE, 2017, 28 :188-195
[6]  
Boverket (Swedish National Board of Housing Building and Planning), 2009, UTV SYST MED EN UPPD
[7]   A Method to Assess the Potential for and Consequences of Energy Retrofits in Swedish Historic Buildings [J].
Brostrom, Tor ;
Eriksson, Petra ;
Liu, Linn ;
Rohdin, Patrik ;
Stahl, Fredrik ;
Moshfegh, Bahram .
HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT-POLICY & PRACTICE, 2014, 5 (02) :150-166
[8]  
Changeworks, 2016, IMPR EN EFF AP BLOCK
[9]   Energy retrofits of Danish homes: is the Energy Performance Certificate useful? [J].
Christensen, Toke Haunstrup ;
Gram-Hanssen, Kirsten ;
de Best-Waldhober, Marjolein ;
Adjei, Afi .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2014, 42 (04) :489-500
[10]  
DeCicco J. M., 1995, ENERGY CONSERVATION