Handling missing MRI sequences in deep learning segmentation of brain metastases: a multicenter study

被引:36
|
作者
Grovik, Endre [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yi, Darvin [4 ]
Iv, Michael [2 ]
Tong, Elizabeth [2 ]
Nilsen, Line Brennhaug [1 ]
Latysheva, Anna [5 ]
Saxhaug, Cathrine [5 ]
Jacobsen, Kari Dolven [6 ]
Helland, Aslaug [6 ]
Emblem, Kyrre Eeg [1 ]
Rubin, Daniel L. [4 ]
Zaharchuk, Greg [2 ]
机构
[1] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Phys, Oslo, Norway
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ South Eastern Norway, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Drammen, Norway
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Biomed Data Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Oslo, Norway
[6] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Oslo, Norway
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
CRITERIA; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1038/s41746-021-00398-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical value of a deep learning (DL) model for automatic detection and segmentation of brain metastases, in which a neural network is trained on four distinct MRI sequences using an input-level dropout layer, thus simulating the scenario of missing MRI sequences by training on the full set and all possible subsets of the input data. This retrospective, multicenter study, evaluated 165 patients with brain metastases. The proposed input-level dropout (ILD) model was trained on multisequence MRI from 100 patients and validated/tested on 10/55 patients, in which the test set was missing one of the four MRI sequences used for training. The segmentation results were compared with the performance of a state-of-the-art DeepLab V3 model. The MR sequences in the training set included pre-gadolinium and post-gadolinium (Gd) T1-weighted 3D fast spin echo, post-Gd T1-weighted inversion recovery (IR) prepped fast spoiled gradient echo, and 3D fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), whereas the test set did not include the IR prepped image-series. The ground truth segmentations were established by experienced neuroradiologists. The results were evaluated using precision, recall, Intersection over union (IoU)-score and Dice score, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve statistics, while the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the performance of the two neural networks. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), averaged across all test cases, was 0.989 +/- 0.029 for the ILD-model and 0.989 +/- 0.023 for the DeepLab V3 model (p = 0.62). The ILD-model showed a significantly higher Dice score (0.795 +/- 0.104 vs. 0.774 +/- 0.104, p = 0.017), and IoU-score (0.561 +/- 0.225 vs. 0.492 +/- 0.186, p < 0.001) compared to the DeepLab V3 model, and a significantly lower average false positive rate of 3.6/patient vs. 7.0/patient (p < 0.001) using a 10 mm(3) lesion-size limit. The ILD-model, trained on all possible combinations of four MRI sequences, may facilitate accurate detection and segmentation of brain metastases on a multicenter basis, even when the test cohort is missing input MRI sequences.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [31] Correlating volumetric and linear measurements of brain metastases on MRI scans using intelligent automation software: a preliminary study
    Ozkara, Burak B.
    Federau, Christian
    Dagher, Samir A.
    Pattnaik, Debajani
    Ucisik, F. Eymen
    Chen, Melissa M.
    Wintermark, Max
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2023, 162 (2) : 363 - 371
  • [32] A Short Review on the Role of Various Deep Learning Techniques for Segmenting and Classifying Brain Tumours from MRI Images
    Kavitha, Kumari
    Kumar, E. Kiran
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, 13 (09) : 815 - 824
  • [33] A systematic review of deep learning in MRI-based cerebral vascular occlusion-based brain diseases
    Bayram, Bilal
    Kunduracioglu, Ismail
    Ince, Suat
    Pacal, Ishak
    NEUROSCIENCE, 2025, 568 : 76 - 94
  • [34] Automatic segmentation of hepatic metastases on DWI images based on a deep learning method: assessment of tumor treatment response according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria
    Liu, Xiang
    Wang, Rui
    Zhu, Zemin
    Wang, Kexin
    Gao, Yue
    Li, Jialun
    Zhang, Yaofeng
    Wang, Xiangpeng
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    Wang, Xiaoying
    BMC CANCER, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [35] Sichuan Pepper Recognition in Complex Environments: A Comparison Study of Traditional Segmentation versus Deep Learning Methods
    Lu, Jinzhu
    Xiang, Juncheng
    Liu, Ting
    Gao, Zongmei
    Liao, Min
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (10):
  • [36] An Italian multicenter retrospective real-life analysis of patients with brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma: the BMRCC study
    Interno, V.
    Massari, F.
    Ruda, R.
    Maiorano, B. A.
    Caffo, O.
    Procopio, G.
    Bracarda, S.
    Atzori, F.
    Passarelli, A.
    Bersanelli, M.
    Stellato, M.
    Fornarini, G.
    Galli, L.
    Ortega, C.
    Zanardi, E.
    Incorvaia, L.
    Facchini, G.
    Berrios, J. R. Giron
    Ricotta, R.
    Santoni, M.
    Funaioli, C.
    Trerotoli, P.
    Porta, C.
    Rizzo, M.
    ESMO OPEN, 2023, 8 (04)
  • [37] A Robust and Accurate Deep-learning-based Method for the Segmentation of Subcortical Brain: Cross-dataset Evaluation of Generalization Performance
    Furuhashi, Naoya
    Okuhata, Shiho
    Kobayashi, Tetsuo
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 20 (02) : 166 - 174
  • [38] Comparison of deep learning-based image segmentation methods for intravascular ultrasound on retrospective and large image cohort study
    Dong, Liang
    Lu, Wei
    Lu, Xuzhou
    Leng, Xiaochang
    Xiang, Jianping
    Li, Changling
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 2023, 22 (01)
  • [39] A Deep Dynamic Causal Learning Model to Study Changes in Dynamic Effective Connectivity During Brain Development
    Wang, Yingying
    Qiao, Chen
    Qu, Gang
    Calhoun, Vince D.
    Stephen, Julia M.
    Wilson, Tony W.
    Wang, Yu-Ping
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 71 (12) : 3390 - 3401
  • [40] 3W-MultiHier: A Three Way Multi-Hierarchical Model Enabled Deep Learning for Brain Tumor Classification in MRI Scans
    Dixit, Asmita
    Thakur, Manish Kumar
    ADVANCED THEORY AND SIMULATIONS, 2025, 8 (03)