Handling missing MRI sequences in deep learning segmentation of brain metastases: a multicenter study

被引:36
|
作者
Grovik, Endre [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yi, Darvin [4 ]
Iv, Michael [2 ]
Tong, Elizabeth [2 ]
Nilsen, Line Brennhaug [1 ]
Latysheva, Anna [5 ]
Saxhaug, Cathrine [5 ]
Jacobsen, Kari Dolven [6 ]
Helland, Aslaug [6 ]
Emblem, Kyrre Eeg [1 ]
Rubin, Daniel L. [4 ]
Zaharchuk, Greg [2 ]
机构
[1] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Phys, Oslo, Norway
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ South Eastern Norway, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Drammen, Norway
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Biomed Data Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Oslo, Norway
[6] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Oslo, Norway
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
CRITERIA; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1038/s41746-021-00398-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical value of a deep learning (DL) model for automatic detection and segmentation of brain metastases, in which a neural network is trained on four distinct MRI sequences using an input-level dropout layer, thus simulating the scenario of missing MRI sequences by training on the full set and all possible subsets of the input data. This retrospective, multicenter study, evaluated 165 patients with brain metastases. The proposed input-level dropout (ILD) model was trained on multisequence MRI from 100 patients and validated/tested on 10/55 patients, in which the test set was missing one of the four MRI sequences used for training. The segmentation results were compared with the performance of a state-of-the-art DeepLab V3 model. The MR sequences in the training set included pre-gadolinium and post-gadolinium (Gd) T1-weighted 3D fast spin echo, post-Gd T1-weighted inversion recovery (IR) prepped fast spoiled gradient echo, and 3D fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), whereas the test set did not include the IR prepped image-series. The ground truth segmentations were established by experienced neuroradiologists. The results were evaluated using precision, recall, Intersection over union (IoU)-score and Dice score, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve statistics, while the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the performance of the two neural networks. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), averaged across all test cases, was 0.989 +/- 0.029 for the ILD-model and 0.989 +/- 0.023 for the DeepLab V3 model (p = 0.62). The ILD-model showed a significantly higher Dice score (0.795 +/- 0.104 vs. 0.774 +/- 0.104, p = 0.017), and IoU-score (0.561 +/- 0.225 vs. 0.492 +/- 0.186, p < 0.001) compared to the DeepLab V3 model, and a significantly lower average false positive rate of 3.6/patient vs. 7.0/patient (p < 0.001) using a 10 mm(3) lesion-size limit. The ILD-model, trained on all possible combinations of four MRI sequences, may facilitate accurate detection and segmentation of brain metastases on a multicenter basis, even when the test cohort is missing input MRI sequences.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Multi-class glioma segmentation on real-world data with missing MRI sequences: comparison of three deep learning algorithms
    Pemberton, Hugh G.
    Wu, Jiaming
    Kommers, Ivar
    Mueller, Domenique M. J.
    Hu, Yipeng
    Goodkin, Olivia
    Vos, Sjoerd B.
    Bisdas, Sotirios
    Robe, Pierre A.
    Ardon, Hilko
    Bello, Lorenzo
    Rossi, Marco
    Sciortino, Tommaso
    Nibali, Marco Conti
    Berger, Mitchel S.
    Hervey-Jumper, Shawn L.
    Bouwknegt, Wim
    van den Brink, Wimar A.
    Furtner, Julia
    Han, Seunggu J.
    Idema, Albert J. S.
    Kiesel, Barbara
    Widhalm, Georg
    Kloet, Alfred
    Wagemakers, Michiel
    Zwinderman, Aeilko H.
    Krieg, Sandro M.
    Mandonnet, Emmanuel
    Prados, Ferran
    de Witt Hamer, Philip
    Barkhof, Frederik
    Eijgelaar, Roelant S.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [2] Deep learning ensembles for detecting brain metastases in longitudinal multi-modal MRI studies
    Machura, Bartosz
    Kucharski, Damian
    Bozek, Oskar
    Eksner, Bartosz
    Kokoszka, Bartosz
    Pekala, Tomasz
    Radom, Mateusz
    Strzelczak, Marek
    Zarudzki, Lukasz
    Gutierrez-Becker, Benjamin
    Krason, Agata
    Tessier, Jean
    Nalepa, Jakub
    COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 2024, 116
  • [3] Accurate MRI-Based Brain Tumor Diagnosis: Integrating Segmentation and Deep Learning Approaches
    Ashimgaliyev, Medet
    Matkarimov, Bakhyt
    Barlybayev, Alibek
    Li, Rita Yi Man
    Zhumadillayeva, Ainur
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (16):
  • [4] A Symmetrical Approach to Brain Tumor Segmentation in MRI Using Deep Learning and Threefold Attention Mechanism
    Rahman, Ziaur
    Zhang, Ruihong
    Bhutto, Jameel Ahmed
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2023, 15 (10):
  • [5] Deep learning for MRI lesion segmentation in rectal cancer
    Yang, Mingwei
    Yang, Miyang
    Yang, Lanlan
    Wang, Zhaochu
    Ye, Peiyun
    Chen, Chujie
    Fu, Liyuan
    Xu, Shangwen
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [6] FastSurferVINN: Building resolution-independence into deep learning segmentation methods-A solution for HighRes brain MRI
    Henschel, Leonie
    Kuegler, David
    Reuter, Martin
    NEUROIMAGE, 2022, 251
  • [7] An Efficient Prostate MRI Segmentation using Deep Learning for better Cancer Diagnosis
    Ali, Syed Saad Azhar
    2024 IEEE CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING, CCECE 2024, 2024, : 324 - 329
  • [8] Multimodal Infant Brain Segmentation by Fuzzy-Informed Deep Learning
    Ding, Weiping
    Abdel-Basset, Mohamed
    Hawash, Hossam
    Pedrycz, Witold
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2022, 30 (04) : 1088 - 1101
  • [9] Brain tumor segmentation based on the fusion of deep semantics and edge information in multimodal MRI
    Zhu, Zhiqin
    He, Xianyu
    Qi, Guanqiu
    Li, Yuanyuan
    Cong, Baisen
    Liu, Yu
    INFORMATION FUSION, 2023, 91 : 376 - 387
  • [10] M3AE: Multimodal Representation Learning for Brain Tumor Segmentation with Missing Modalities
    Liu, Hong
    Wei, Dong
    Lu, Donghuan
    Sun, Jinghan
    Wang, Liansheng
    Zheng, Yefeng
    THIRTY-SEVENTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 37 NO 2, 2023, : 1657 - 1665