Liver metastases from colorectal cancer: propensity score-based comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy vs. microwave ablation

被引:30
|
作者
Franzese, Ciro [1 ]
Comito, Tiziana [1 ]
Clerici, Elena [1 ]
Di Brina, Lucia [1 ]
Tomatis, Stefano [1 ]
Navarria, Pierina [1 ]
Reggiori, Giacomo [1 ]
Vigano, Luca [2 ]
Poretti, Dario [3 ]
Pedicini, Vittorio [3 ]
Torzilli, Guido [2 ,4 ]
Solbiati, Luigi [3 ,4 ]
Scorsetti, Marta [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Humanitas Clin & Res Hosp, Radiotherapy & Radiosurg, Via Manzoni 56, Milan, Italy
[2] Humanitas Clin & Res Hosp, Dept Hepatobiliary & Gen Surg, Milan, Italy
[3] Humanitas Clin & Res Hosp, Dept Radiol & Intervent Radiol, Milan, Italy
[4] Humanitas Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Milan, Italy
关键词
SBRT; Oligometastases; Liver; Ablation; Radiotherapy; PERCUTANEOUS RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; LOCAL TUMOR PROGRESSION; PHASE-II; RADIOTHERAPY; MARGIN; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00432-018-2692-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose The study aim was to compare the disease control in two groups of patients affected by liver metastases from CRC treated with microwave ablation (MWA) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Methods We extracted data of patients treated between 2009 and 2016. Inclusion criteria were: (1) maximum diameter of the liver lesions less than 4 cm; (2) no more than three liver lesions; (3) no evidence of progressive or untreated gross disease outside the liver; (4) adequate liver function; (5) no concurrent chemotherapy; (6) minimum age of 18. Tumour response was classified according to EORTC-RECIST criteria. Aim of the present study was to evaluate freedom from local progression (FFLP). To reduce indication bias, an inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to estimate treatment effect. Results A total of 135 patients with 214 lesions were included in the analysis. Median follow-up time was 24.5 months (range 2.4-95.8). The 1-year freedom from local progression (FFLP) was 88% (95%CI 80-92). In the SBRT group, FFLP was statistically longer than MWA group (p =0.0214); the 1-year FFLP was 91% (95% CI 81-95) in SBRT group and 84% (95% CI 0.72-0.91) in MWA group. Patients treated with SBRT showed a reduce risk of local relapse compared to MWA (adjusted HR 0.31; 95%CI 0.13-0.70, p =0.005). As expected, analogous result obtained in the inverse probability weighting analysis (HR 0.38; 95%CI 0.18-0.80; p=0.011). Conclusion In conclusion, there seems to be an advantage of SBRT compared to MWA in treating CRC liver metastases, particularly for lesions bigger than 30 mm.
引用
收藏
页码:1777 / 1783
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Intrahepatic Metastases
    Jackson, William C.
    Tao, Yebin
    Mendiratta-Lala, Mishal
    Bazzi, Latifa
    Wahl, Dan R.
    Schipper, Matthew J.
    Feng, Mary
    Cuneo, Kyle C.
    Lawrence, Theodore S.
    Owen, Dawn
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 100 (04): : 950 - 958
  • [22] Stereotactic radiation therapy for liver metastases from colorectal cancer: Predictors for outcome.
    Fumagalli, I.
    Dewas, S.
    Bibault, J.
    Mirabel, X.
    Kramar, A.
    Jarraya, H.
    Lacornerie, T.
    Dewas-Vautravers, C.
    Lartigau, E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (15)
  • [23] Linac-based stereotactic body radiation therapy vs moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy in prostate cancer: propensity-score based comparison of outcome and toxicity
    Franzese, Ciro
    D'agostino, Giuseppe
    Di Brina, Lucia
    Navarria, Pierina
    De Rose, Fiorenza
    Comito, Tiziana
    Franceschini, Davide
    Mancosu, Pietro
    Tomatis, Stefano
    Scorsetti, Marta
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 92 (1097):
  • [24] Stereotactic body radiation therapy: a potential treatment option for colorectal liver metastases
    van der Pool, A. E. M.
    Romero, A. Mendez
    Wunderink, W.
    Nowak, P. J.
    de Wilt, J. H. W.
    Eggermont, A. M. M.
    Ijzermans, J. N.
    Heijmen, B. J.
    Levendag, P. C.
    Verhoef, C.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2009, 7 (02): : 156 - 156
  • [25] Comparison of RapidArc vs. Conventional Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer
    Kielar, K. N.
    Atwood, T. F.
    Taniguchi, C. M.
    Christman-Skieller, C.
    Xing, L.
    Koong, A. C.
    Chang, D. T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S785 - S785
  • [26] Long-term outcome of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for patient with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer
    Py, J. F.
    Salleron, J.
    Courrech, F.
    Beckendorf, V
    Croise-Laurent, V
    Peiffert, D.
    Vogin, G.
    Dietmann, A. S.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2021, 25 (04): : 350 - 357
  • [27] Stereotactic body radiation therapy and radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of liver metastases: How and when?
    Cacciola, Alberto
    Parisi, Silvana
    Tamburella, Consuelo
    Lillo, Sara
    Ferini, Gianluca
    Molino, Laura
    Iati, Giuseppe
    Pontoriero, Antonio
    Bottari, Antonio
    Mazziotti, Silvio
    Cicero, Giuseppe
    Minutoli, Fabio
    Blandino, Alfredo
    Pergolizzi, Stefano
    REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2020, 25 (03) : 299 - 306
  • [28] Conformal Radiation Therapy or Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: Institutional Experience in the Management of Colorectal Liver Metastases by Radiation Therapy
    He, Zemin
    Chen, Gang
    Ouyang, Bo
    Zhang, Haoyue
    Chen, Hui
    Wang, Yehuang
    Yan, Shushan
    Pan, Wei
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2018, 17
  • [29] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Compared With Radiofrequency Ablation for Inoperable Colorectal Liver Metastases
    Kim, Hayeon
    Gill, Beant
    Beriwal, Sushil
    Huq, M. Saiful
    Roberts, Mark S.
    Smith, Kenneth J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (04): : 1175 - 1183
  • [30] Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer: size matters
    S. Flamarique
    M. Campo
    G. Asín
    S. Pellejero
    A. Viúdez
    F. Arias
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2020, 22 : 2350 - 2356