Decomposition of sources of income-related health inequality applied on SF-36 summary scores: a Danish health survey

被引:13
作者
Gundgaard, Jens
Lauridsen, Jorgen
机构
[1] Univ So Denmark, Inst Publ Hlth Hlth Econ, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
[2] Univ So Denmark, Dept Econ & Business, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1477-7525-4-53
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: If the SF-36 summary scores are used as health status measures for the purpose of measuring health inequality it is relevant to be informed about the sources of the inequality in order to be able to target the specific aspects of health with the largest impact. Methods: Data were from a Danish health survey on health status, health behaviour and socioeconomic background. Decompositions of concentration indices were carried out to examine the sources of income-related inequality in physical and mental health, using the physical and mental health summary scores from SF-36. Results: The analyses show how the different subscales from SF-36 and various explanatory variables contribute to overall inequality in physical and mental health. The decompositions contribute with information about the importance of the different aspects of health and off-setting effects that would otherwise be missed in the aggregate summary scores. However, the complicated scoring mechanism of the summary scores with negative coefficients makes it difficult to interpret the contributions and to draw policy implications. Conclusion: Decomposition techniques provide insights to how subscales contribute to income-related inequality when SF-36 summary scores are used.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Socioeconomic status and health: What we know and what we don't [J].
Adler, NE ;
Ostrove, JM .
SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS AND HEALTH IN INDUSTRIAL NATIONS: SOCIAL, PSYCHOLOGICAL, AND BIOLOGICAL PATHWAYS, 1999, 896 :3-15
[2]  
Bjorner Jakob Bue, 1997, Danish Manual to SF-36: A Health Status Questionaire
[3]   The Danish SF-36 Health Survey: Translation and preliminary validity studies [J].
Bjorner, JB ;
Thunedborg, K ;
Kristensen, TS ;
Modvig, J ;
Bech, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (11) :991-999
[4]   DEVELOPING MULTIATTRIBUTE HEALTH INDEXES [J].
BOYLE, MH ;
TORRANCE, GW .
MEDICAL CARE, 1984, 22 (11) :1045-1057
[5]  
Brazier J, 1993, Health Econ, V2, P213, DOI 10.1002/hec.4730020304
[6]   Comparing health inequalities among men aged 18-65 years in Australia and England using the SF-36 [J].
Clarke, P ;
Smith, L ;
Jenkinson, C .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2002, 26 (02) :136-143
[7]   A note on the decomposition of the health concentration index [J].
Clarke, PM ;
Gerdtham, UG ;
Connelly, LB .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2003, 12 (06) :511-516
[8]  
Dahlgren G, 2000, POLICIES STRATEGIES
[9]  
GUNDGAARD J, 2002, EVALUATION PREVENTIO
[10]   The impact of depression is unevenly distributed in the population [J].
Isacson, D ;
Bingefors, K ;
von Knorring, L .
EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 20 (03) :205-212