The Navigation Guide Systematic Review Methodology: A Rigorous and Transparent Method for Translating Environmental Health Science into Better Health Outcomes

被引:302
作者
Woodruff, Tracey J. [1 ]
Sutton, Patrice [1 ]
机构
[1] UCSF, Program Reprod Hlth & Environm, Oakland, CA 94612 USA
关键词
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; PERFLUOROOCTANOIC ACID; PERFLUORINATED COMPOUNDS; PERFLUOROALKYL ACIDS; ANIMAL-MODELS; CHEMICALS; PFOA; EXPOSURES; DISEASE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1289/ehp.1307175
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Synthesizing what is known about the environmental drivers of health is instrumental to taking prevention-oriented action. Methods of research synthesis commonly used in environmental health lag behind systematic review methods developed in the clinical sciences over the past 20 years. OBJECTIVES: We sought to develop a proof of concept of the "Navigation Guide," a systematic and transparent method of research synthesis in environmental health. DISCUSSION: The Navigation Guide methodology builds on best practices in research synthesis in evidence-based medicine and environmental health. Key points of departure from current methods of expert-based narrative review prevalent in environmental health include a prespecified protocol, standardized and transparent documentation including expert judgment, a comprehensive search strategy, assessment of "risk of bias," and separation of the science from values and preferences. Key points of departure from evidence-based medicine include assigning a "moderate" quality rating to human observational studies and combining diverse evidence streams. CONCLUSIONS: The Navigation Guide methodology is a systematic and rigorous approach to research synthesis that has been developed to reduce bias and maximize transparency in the evaluation of environmental health information. Although novel aspects of the method will require further development and validation, our findings demonstrated that improved methods of research synthesis under development at the National Toxicology Program and under consideration by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency are fully achievable. The institutionalization of robust methods of systematic and transparent review would provide a concrete mechanism for linking science to timely action to prevent harm.
引用
收藏
页码:1007 / 1014
页数:8
相关论文
共 97 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2009, SCI DEC ADV RISK ASS, DOI DOI 10.17226/12209
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, STATE SCI ENDOCRINE
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1996, S P R GUID REPR TOX
  • [4] [Anonymous], REV ENV PROT AG STAT
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2012, METHODS GUIDE EFFECT
  • [6] [Anonymous], KNOW WHAT WORKS HLTH
  • [7] [Anonymous], DES ENV PROGR MAST C
  • [8] A COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF METAANALYSES OF RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIALS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF CLINICAL EXPERTS - TREATMENTS FOR MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
    ANTMAN, EM
    LAU, J
    KUPELNICK, B
    MOSTELLER, F
    CHALMERS, TC
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 268 (02): : 240 - 248
  • [9] GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence
    Balshem, Howard
    Helfand, Mark
    Schuenemann, Holger J.
    Oxman, Andrew D.
    Kunz, Regina
    Brozek, Jan
    Vist, Gunn E.
    Falck-Ytter, Yngve
    Meerpohl, Joerg
    Norris, Susan
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (04) : 401 - 406
  • [10] Barnes D E, 1997, Tob Control, V6, P19