Hydrocarbon liquefaction: viability as a peak oil mitigation strategy

被引:18
作者
Hook, Mikael [1 ]
Fantazzini, Dean [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Angelantoni, Andre [5 ]
Snowden, Simon [6 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Earth Sci, S-75236 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Moscow MV Lomonosov State Univ, Moscow Sch Econ, Moscow, Russia
[3] Higher Sch Econ, Fac Econ, Moscow, Russia
[4] Higher Sch Econ, Int Coll Econ & Finance, Moscow, Russia
[5] Post Peak Living, San Francisco, CA USA
[6] Univ Liverpool, Sch Management, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
来源
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES | 2014年 / 372卷 / 2006期
关键词
hydrocarbon liquefaction; gas-to-liquids; coal-to-liquids; peak oil; NATURAL-GAS; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; SUPPLY CHAINS; LIQUID FUELS; COAL; ENERGY; TECHNOLOGY; BIOMASS; FUTURE; GTL;
D O I
10.1098/rsta.2012.0319
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Current world capacity of hydrocarbon liquefaction is around 400 000 barrels per day, providing a marginal share of the global liquid fuel supply. This study performs a broad review of technical, economic, environmental and supply chain issues related to coal-to-liquids (CTL) and gas-to-liquids (GTL). We find three issues predominate. First, significant amounts of coal and gas would be required to obtain anything more than a marginal production of liquids. Second, the economics of CTL plants are clearly prohibitive, but are better for GTL. Nevertheless, large-scale GTL plants still require very high upfront costs, and for three real-world GTL plants out of four, the final cost has been so far approximately three times that initially budgeted. Small-scale GTL holds potential for associated gas. Third, both CTL and GTL incur significant environmental impacts, ranging from increased greenhouse gas emissions (in the case of CTL) to water contamination. Environmental concerns may significantly affect growth of these projects until adequate solutions are found.
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文
共 134 条
  • [1] Adedeji O., 2008, NATURAL GAS EC GTL S
  • [2] Al-Shalchi W., 2006, GAS LIQUIDS TECHNOLO
  • [3] Ang L, 2010, NATRUAL GAS TRANSPOR
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, WORLD EN OUTL 2011
  • [5] [Anonymous], TECHNOLOGY
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2000, SPEC REP IPCC WORK G
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2012, Annual Energy Outlook, 2012
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2011, NEW TECHNOLOGY MAGAZ
  • [9] [Anonymous], GLOB OIL DEPL ASS EV
  • [10] DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF IRON-BASED CATALYSTS FOR THE HYDROLIQUEFACTION OF COAL
    BACAUD, R
    JAMOND, M
    DIACK, M
    GRUBER, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 1994, 18 (02) : 167 - 176