Comparative Analysis of the Shear Bond Strength of Flowable Self-Adhering Resin-Composites Adhesive to Dentin with a Conventional Adhesive

被引:7
作者
Asiri, Abdulmajeed Ali [1 ]
Khan, Rawaiz [2 ]
Alzahrani, Sultan Saeed [1 ]
Haider, Sajjad [3 ]
Khan, Salah Ud-Din [4 ]
Asiri, Essa Ali Mousa [1 ]
Alamri, Maha Fayez [1 ]
Ahmad, Ashfaq [5 ]
Mubushar, Muhammad [6 ]
机构
[1] Minist Hlth, Jeddah Specialty Dent Ctr, Jeddah 21577, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Saud Univ, Coll Dent, Dent & Oral Rehabil, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Saud Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Chem Engn, POB 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Saud Univ, Coll Engn, Sustainable Energy Technol SET Ctr, POB 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
[5] King Saud Univ Riyadh, Coll Sci, Dept Chem, POB 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
[6] King Saud Univ, Coll Food & Agr Sci, Dept Plant Prod, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
关键词
shear bond strength; dental adhesives; flowable resin composites; self-adhering composites; SURFACE-MORPHOLOGY; GENERATION; SYSTEMS; ENAMEL;
D O I
10.3390/coatings11030273
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This study aimed to measure and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of a self-adhering flowable resin composite to dentin with a conventional flowable composite, and evaluate the various modes of failure. Thirty human premolar teeth (n = 30) were randomly allocated to two groups (Group I: Vertise (TM) Flow; Group II: Filtek Ultimate + Single Bond Universal) of 15 specimens each, and SBS was measured for specimens from each group by applying a shear load using a universal testing machine (UTM). Modes of failure were observed with an optical microscope. An independent-samples T-test was performed to test Levene's assumption of homogeneity of variance across both groups, with the critical value set at 0.05. The results revealed, that the self-adhering flowable composite (Group I: Vertise (TM) Flow) resulted in a lower shear bond strength compared with the conventional adhesive system composite (Group II: Filtek Ultimate + Single Bond Universal). Moreover, group I predominantly exhibited non-cohesive failure, which reflects poor bonding to dentin. On the other hand, Group II showed mixed failure for most of the samples, which demonstrated strong adhesive bonding. Therefore, it could be concluded that the self-adhering flowable resin composite (Group I) results in lower SBS to dentin compared with a conventional adhesive system.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
al-Salehi S K, 1997, Quintessence Int, V28, P717
[2]   Shear Bond Strength of a Self-adhering Flowable Composite and a Flowable Base Composite to Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Calcium-enriched Mixture Cement, and Biodentine [J].
Altunsoy, Mustafa ;
Tanriver, Mehmet ;
Ok, Evren ;
Kucukyilmaz, Ebru .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2015, 41 (10) :1691-1695
[3]   SOLUBILITY PARAMETERS, FRACTIONAL POLARITIES, AND BOND STRENGTHS OF SOME INTERMEDIARY RESINS USED IN DENTIN BONDING [J].
ASMUSSEN, E ;
UNO, S .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1993, 72 (03) :558-565
[4]   Evaluation of a self-adhering flowable composite in terms of micro-shear bond strength and microleakage [J].
Bektas, Ozden Ozel ;
Eren, Digdem ;
Akin, Emine Gulsah ;
Akin, Hakan .
ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 71 (3-4) :541-546
[5]  
Ben-Amar A, 1978, Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim, V27, P25
[6]   Dentin Bonding and SEM Analysis of a New Experimental Universal Adhesive System Containing a Dendrimer [J].
e Cruz, Joana Vasconcelos ;
Polido, Mario ;
Brito, Jose ;
Goncalves, Luisa L. .
POLYMERS, 2020, 12 (02)
[7]   Does the use of a novel self-adhesive flowable composite reduce nanoleakage? [J].
El Naga, Abeer Abo ;
Yousef, Mohammed ;
Ramadan, Rasha ;
Bahgat, Sherif Fayez ;
Alshawwa, Lana .
CLINICAL COSMETIC AND INVESTIGATIONAL DENTISTRY, 2015, 7 :55-64
[8]  
Ferdianakis K, 1998, J Clin Pediatr Dent, V22, P221
[9]   Chemical analysis and bonding reaction of RelyX Unicem and Bifix composites -: A comparative study [J].
Gerth, Hans U. V. ;
Dammaschke, Till ;
Zuechner, Harald ;
Schaefer, Edgar .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2006, 22 (10) :934-941
[10]  
Giannini Marcelo, 2015, Braz. Dent. J., V26, P3, DOI 10.1590/0103-6440201302442