Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) a critical review

被引:103
作者
Ganpule, Arvind P. [1 ]
Vijayakumar, Mohankumar [1 ]
Malpani, Ankur [1 ]
Desai, Mahesh R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Muljibhai Patel Urol Hosp, Dept Urol, Nadiad 387001, Gujarat, India
关键词
PCNL; Miniperc; Microperc; SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; STAGHORN CALCULUS; MANAGEMENT; COMPLICATIONS; POSITION; SURGERY; ACCESS; SUPINE; TRIAL; PRONE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.11.028
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the preferred treatment of choice for renal calculi. PCNL has evolved remarkably since the eighties when it was first described. Approach: Approach might be by either supine or prone and the access is made with the help of either fluoroscopy or ultrasound. Recently endoscopy guided puncture has also been described. Miniaturization: Traditionally the tract size for PCNL used to be 30Fr. Even though the stone clearance rate was good there were complications such as bleeding With the advent of excellent optics and advances in stone fragmentation the tract size has reduced to a great extent which has reduced the complications without compromising the stone clearance. Complications: The complications related to access might be injury to pleura, and other visceral organs. The other complications are bleeding, infection and incomplete stone clearance. Conclusion: PCNL has emerged as most efficient procedure among these approaches to stone removal, though not devoid of complications and requirement for skills. The drive for minimal invasive approach should not compromise stone clearance, latter being the core principle of endourology. In skilled hands PCNL is the answer to stone questions we as urologist face day to day. though which form of PCNL is to be chosen depends on surgeons skill level and discretion. (c) 2016 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:660 / 664
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Lower pole I: A prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis - Initial results [J].
Albala, DM ;
Assimos, DG ;
Clayman, RV ;
Denstedt, JD ;
Grasso, M ;
Gutierrez-Aceves, J ;
Kahn, RI ;
Leveillee, RJ ;
Lingeman, JE ;
Macaluso, JN ;
Munch, LC ;
Nakada, SY ;
Newman, RC ;
Pearle, MS ;
Preminger, GM ;
Teichman, J ;
Woods, JR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (06) :2072-2080
[2]   Colonic perforation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Study of risk factors [J].
El-Nahas, Ahmed R. ;
Shokeir, Ahmed A. ;
El-Assmy, Ahmed M. ;
Shoma, Ahmed M. ;
Eraky, Ibrahim ;
El-Kenawy, Mahmoud R. ;
El-Kappany, Hamdy A. .
UROLOGY, 2006, 67 (05) :937-941
[3]   Management of the staghorn calculus: multiple-tract versus single-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy [J].
Ganpule, Arvind P. ;
Desai, Mahesh .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2008, 18 (02) :220-223
[4]   The hickman peel-away sheath: Alternative for pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy [J].
Helal, M ;
Black, T ;
Lockhart, J ;
Figueroa, TE .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1997, 11 (03) :171-172
[5]   Endoscopic-guided Versus Fluoroscopic-guided Renal Access for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Comparative Analysis [J].
Isac, Wahib ;
Rizkala, Emad ;
Liu, Xiaobo ;
Noble, Mark ;
Monga, Manoj .
UROLOGY, 2013, 81 (02) :251-256
[6]  
Jain V, 2009, UROLOGY, V74, P522, DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2008.11.062
[7]  
Kukreja R, 2004, J ENDOUROL, V18, P715, DOI 10.1089/0892779042360599
[8]  
Lingeman J.E., 2005, J UROLOGY, V173, P469
[9]   Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy [J].
Michel, Maurice Stephan ;
Trojan, Lutz ;
Rassweiler, Jens Jochen .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 51 (04) :899-906
[10]   Staghorn Morphometry: A New Tool for Clinical Classification and Prediction Model for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Monotherapy [J].
Mishra, Shashikant ;
Sabnis, Ravindra B. ;
Desai, Mahesh .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 (01) :6-14