Characteristics and quality of genetics and genomics mobile apps: a systematic review

被引:21
作者
Talwar, Divya [1 ,2 ]
Yeh, Yu-Lyu [1 ]
Chen, Wei-Ju [1 ]
Chen, Lei-Shih [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Hlth & Kinesiol, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1038/s41431-019-0360-2
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Mobile applications (apps) have been increasingly utilized to access the latest and abundant information related to genetics/genomics for resources, risk assessments, and individualized recommendations. Nevertheless, the number and quality of the current apps in genetics/genomics remain unknown. Thus, in this review, we aimed to identify existing genetic/genomic apps, summarize their characteristics, and examine their quality. A systematic search of genetics/genomics apps was conducted on Apple Store and Google Play. We adapted a validated evaluation scale, Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS), to examine the quality of genetics/genomics apps. Eighty-eight genetics/genomics apps, with the cost ranging from free to $49.99, formed the final sample. Findings showed that the majority of the apps had reference/resource as a feature (95.5%), had health professional students as the target audience (86.4%), and did not focus on specific diseases (78.5%). Only 21.6% of the apps were developed by reliable or authoritative agencies, and the apps' overall quality was slightly above average based on the criteria of the MARS. Therefore, while genetics/genomics mobile apps might be useful resources, their quality still needs improvement, especially with respect to the credibility and evidence-based items of app information as well as the customization items of app engagement; caution must be taken when using those apps.
引用
收藏
页码:833 / 840
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY Which app should I use? [J].
Armstrong, Stephen .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 351
[2]   Mobile Applications for Diabetics: A Systematic Review and Expert-Based Usability Evaluation Considering the Special Requirements of Diabetes Patients Age 50 Years or Older [J].
Arnhold, Madlen ;
Quade, Mandy ;
Kirch, Wilhelm .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (04) :34-51
[3]   A review and content analysis of engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information quality, and change techniques in the most popular commercial apps for weight management [J].
Bardus, Marco ;
van Beurden, Samantha B. ;
Smith, Jane R. ;
Abraham, Charles .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2016, 13
[4]  
Bender J, 2019, J MED INTERNET RES, V15, pe287
[5]   The Lancet Technology: September, 2011 [J].
Boyce, Niall .
LANCET, 2011, 378 (9795) :975-975
[6]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Office of Public Health Genomics, 2010, GEN WORKF COMP
[7]   Features of Mobile Diabetes Applications: Review of the Literature and Analysis of Current Applications Compared Against Evidence-Based Guidelines [J].
Chomutare, Taridzo ;
Fernandez-Luque, Luis ;
Arsand, Eirik ;
Hartvigsen, Gunnar .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2011, 13 (03) :e65
[8]   Behavior Change Techniques in Top-Ranked Mobile Apps for Physical Activity [J].
Conroy, David E. ;
Yang, Chih-Hsiang ;
Maher, Jaclyn P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 46 (06) :649-652
[9]   Review and Analysis of Existing Mobile Phone Apps to Support Heart Failure Symptom Monitoring and Self-Care Management Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) [J].
Creber, Ruth M. Masterson ;
Maurer, Mathew S. ;
Reading, Meghan ;
Hiraldo, Grenny ;
Hickey, Kathleen T. ;
Iribarren, Sarah .
JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2016, 4 (02) :470-482
[10]   A New Tool for Nutrition App Quality Evaluation (AQEL): Development, Validation, and Reliability Testing [J].
DiFilippo, Kristen Nicole ;
Huang, Wenhao ;
Chapman-Novakofski, Karen M. .
JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2017, 5 (10)