Counterproductive Behaviors and Psychological Well-being: The Moderating Effect of Task Interdependence

被引:69
作者
Aube, C. [1 ]
Rousseau, V. [2 ]
Mama, C. [1 ]
Morin, E. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] HEC Montreal, Dept Management, Montreal, PQ H3T 2A7, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Sch Ind Relat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Counterproductive behaviors; Psychological well-being; Task interdependence; Teamwork; Moderating effect; ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE; CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS; JOB STRESS; WORK; WORKPLACE; HEALTH; DIMENSIONALITY; DISTRESS; MODEL; COMPANIONSHIP;
D O I
10.1007/s10869-009-9113-5
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between counterproductive behaviors (CPBs) and psychological well-being in a teamwork setting. Moreover, we examined the moderating effect of task interdependence. CPBs are considered in light of four dimensions, namely parasitism, interpersonal aggression, boastfulness, and misuse of resources. Data were collected from a sample of 249 individuals working in a Canadian prison. The study was based on two measurement times. The results reveal that the four dimensions of CPBs are negatively related to psychological well-being and that relationships involving interpersonal aggression and boastfulness are moderated by task interdependence. This study highlights the importance for managers to identify the presence of CPBs in their team as soon as possible so as to be able to remedy them before they affect team members' psychological well-being. Moreover, interpersonal aggression and boastfulness may be particularly detrimental in a context of high interdependence. This study further extends the nomological network of CPBs. Indeed, the results indicate that the presence of CPBs may harm employees' mental health. Furthermore, this study shows that a contextual characteristic (i.e., task interdependence) may amplify the detrimental effect of some CPBs.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 361
页数:11
相关论文
共 79 条
[31]   ENHANCING EFFECTIVENESS - AN INVESTIGATION OF ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF VALUE-BASED INTRAGROUP CONFLICT [J].
JEHN, KA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT, 1994, 5 (03) :223-238
[32]   SOCIAL LOAFING - RESEARCH FINDINGS, IMPLICATIONS, AND FUTURE-DIRECTIONS [J].
KARAU, SJ ;
WILLIAMS, KD .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1995, 4 (05) :134-140
[33]   Building healthy workplaces: What we know so far [J].
Kelloway, EK ;
Day, AL .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DU COMPORTEMENT, 2005, 37 (04) :223-235
[34]   Analyzing interaction patterns in dysfunctional teams [J].
Keyton, J .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 1999, 30 (04) :491-518
[35]  
Kiggundu M. N., 1981, Academy of Management Review, V6, P499, DOI [DOI 10.5465/AMR.1981.4285795, 10.5465/AMR.1981.4285795, DOI 10.2307/257385]
[36]  
Kline R.B., 2016, Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
[37]  
Kozlowski S.W., 2003, COMPREHENSIVE HDB PS, V12, P333, DOI [DOI 10.1002/0471264385.WEI1214, 10.1002/0471264385.wei1214, 10.4324/9781315805986-21]
[38]  
Lanyon RI, 2004, J BUS PSYCHOL, V18, P533
[39]   MANY HANDS MAKE LIGHT THE WORK - CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF SOCIAL LOAFING [J].
LATANE, B ;
WILLIAMS, K ;
HARKINS, S .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 37 (06) :822-832
[40]  
Leavitt H., 1975, MAN WORK SOC, P67