Consumer purchase intentions for electric vehicles: Is green more important than price and range?

被引:276
作者
Degirmenci, Kenan [1 ]
Breitner, Michael H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Management, 2 George St, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[2] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Sch Econ & Management, Konigsworther Pl 1, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Electric vehicles; Environmental performance; Price value; Range confidence; Purchase intention; Structural equation modeling; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; TECHNOLOGY; ADOPTION; SATISFACTION; CONSUMPTION; ACCEPTANCE; ATTITUDES; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.trd.2017.01.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In view of global warming and climate change, a transition from combustion to electric vehicles (EVs) can help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve air quality. However, high acquisition costs and short driving ranges are considered to be main factors which impede the diffusion of EVs. Since electricity needs to be produced from renewable energy sources for EVs to be a true green alternative, the environmental performance of EVs is also presumed to be an important factor. This paper investigates the role of environmental performance compared to price value and range confidence regarding consumer purchase intentions for EVs. To develop our hypothesis, we interview 40 end-user subjects about their beliefs toward EVs. Then, we perform 167 test drives with a plug-in battery EV and conduct a survey with the participants to test the hypothesis. Results of a structural equation modeling support the hypothesis that the environmental performance of EVs is a stronger predictor of attitude and thus purchase intention than price value and range confidence. (C) 2017 ElseVier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 260
页数:11
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]   Scaling and testing multiplicative combinations in the expectancy-value model of attitudes [J].
Ajzen, Icek ;
Fishbein, Martin .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 38 (09) :2222-2247
[3]   Sensitivity analysis for energy demand estimation of electric vehicles [J].
Asamer, Johannes ;
Graser, Anita ;
Heilmann, Bernhard ;
Ruthmair, Mario .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 46 :182-199
[4]  
Bagozzi R., 2007, J ASS INFORM SYSTEMS, V8, P12, DOI DOI 10.17705/1jais.00122
[5]  
Bagozzi RichardP., 1984, International Journal of Research in Marketing, V1, P295, DOI [10.1016/0167-8116(84)90017-X, DOI 10.1016/0167-8116(84)90017-X]
[6]   THE PROBLEM OF STATISTICAL POWER IN MIS RESEARCH [J].
BAROUDI, JJ ;
ORLIKOWSKI, WJ .
MIS QUARTERLY, 1989, 13 (01) :87-106
[7]  
Bhattacherjee A, 2004, MIS QUART, V28, P229
[8]   Developments of CO2-emissions and costs for small electric and combustion engine vehicles in Germany [J].
Bickert, Stefan ;
Kampker, Achim ;
Greger, Dennis .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 36 :138-151
[9]   Can Protection Motivation Theory predict pro-environmental behavior? Explaining the adoption of electric vehicles in the Netherlands [J].
Bockarjova, M. ;
Steg, L. .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2014, 28 :276-288
[10]  
Boyatzis R., 1998, TRANSFORMING QUALITA