The Effects of GM Technology on Maize Yield

被引:26
作者
Chavas, Jean-Paul [1 ]
Shi, Guanming [1 ]
Lauer, Joseph [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Agr & Appl Econ, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Agron, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
CORN; TRAITS; CROPS; BT;
D O I
10.2135/cropsci2013.10.0709
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In the United States, maize (Zea mays L.) farmers have adopted genetic-modification technology rapidly since its first commercialization in 1996. By 2012, 88% of U.S. maize is planted with genetically modified (GM) hybrids. Our objective in the paper is to present an empirical analysis of the determinants of U.S. maize yield using experimental maize production data, with a focus on the interaction effects of GM technology, management, and risk. Genetic-modification technology had a stronger impact on the lower end of maize yield distribution within a trial thereby reducing exposure to downside risk. A strong interaction exists between GM technology and crop rotations: GM reduces the adverse effects of maize-maize rotation on yield. As such, GM technology is found to be a substitute for crop rotation. Genetic-modification technology increases the yield gains associated with higher planting density. This indicates that GM technology offers good prospects for future improvements in maize productivity.
引用
收藏
页码:1331 / 1335
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   A comprehensive study of plant density consequences on nitrogen uptake dynamics of maize plants from vegetative to reproductive stages [J].
Ciampitti, Ignacio A. ;
Vyn, Tony J. .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2011, 121 (01) :2-18
[2]   The contribution of breeding to yield advances in maize (Zea mays L.) [J].
Duvick, DN .
ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, VOLUME 86, 2005, 86 :83-145
[3]   Transgenic insect resistance traits increase corn yield and yield stability [J].
Edgerton, Michael D. ;
Fridgen, Jon ;
Anderson, John R., Jr. ;
Ahlgrim, Jenne ;
Criswell, Monty ;
Dhungana, Prabhakar ;
Gocken, Tom ;
Li, Zheng ;
Mariappan, Sadayappan ;
Pilcher, Clinton D. ;
Rosielle, Arnold ;
Stark, Steven B. .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 30 (06) :493-496
[4]   Areawide Suppression of European Corn Borer with Bt Maize Reaps Savings to Non-Bt Maize Growers [J].
Hutchison, W. D. ;
Burkness, E. C. ;
Mitchell, P. D. ;
Moon, R. D. ;
Leslie, T. W. ;
Fleischer, S. J. ;
Abrahamson, M. ;
Hamilton, K. L. ;
Steffey, K. L. ;
Gray, M. E. ;
Hellmich, R. L. ;
Kaster, L. V. ;
Hunt, T. E. ;
Wright, R. J. ;
Pecinovsky, K. ;
Rabaey, T. L. ;
Flood, B. R. ;
Raun, E. S. .
SCIENCE, 2010, 330 (6001) :222-225
[5]  
Koenker R., 2005, Econometric Society Monographs, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511754098, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511754098]
[6]   Yield effects of genetically modified crops in developing countries [J].
Qaim, M ;
Zilberman, D .
SCIENCE, 2003, 299 (5608) :900-902
[7]   Commercialized transgenic traits, maize productivity and yield risk [J].
Shi, Guanming ;
Chavas, Jean-Paul ;
Lauer, Joseph .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2013, 31 (02) :111-114
[8]   Optimum plant population of bt and non-bt corn in Wisconsin [J].
Stanger, Trenton F. ;
Lauer, Joseph G. .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2006, 98 (04) :914-921
[9]  
University of Wisconsin, 2014, WISC CORN HYBR TRIAL
[10]  
USDA) U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2013, EAS 123 FRUIT FLY SU