ASPECT: A Survey to Assess Student Perspective of Engagement in an Active-Learning Classroom

被引:63
作者
Wiggins, Benjamin L. [1 ]
Eddy, Sarah L. [2 ,3 ]
Wener-Fligner, Leah [4 ]
Freisem, Karen [5 ]
Grunspan, Daniel Z. [6 ]
Theobald, Elli J. [1 ]
Timbrook, Jerry [7 ]
Crowe, Alison J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Biol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Florida Int Univ, Dept Biol, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[3] Florida Int Univ, STEM Transformat Inst, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Coll Educ, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Ctr Teaching & Learning, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Arizona State Univ, Ctr Evolut & Med, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[7] Univ Nebraska, Dept Sociol, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
SCIENCE; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGIES; QUESTIONNAIRE; MATHEMATICS; TECHNOLOGY; INSTRUMENT; BIOLOGY; VALUES; TOOL;
D O I
10.1187/cbe.16-08-0244
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The primary measure used to determine relative effectiveness of in-class activities has been student performance on pre/posttests. However, in today's active-learning classrooms, learning is a social activity, requiring students to interact and learn from their peers. To develop effective active-learning exercises that engage students, it is important to gain a more holistic view of the student experience in an active-learning classroom. We have taken a mixed-methods approach to iteratively develop and validate a 16-item survey to measure multiple facets of the student experience during active-learning exercises. The instrument, which we call Assessing Student Perspective of Engagement in Class Tool (ASPECT), was administered to a large introductory biology class, and student responses were subjected to exploratory factor analysis. The 16 items loaded onto three factors that cumulatively explained 52% of the variation in student response: 1) value of activity, 2) personal effort, and 3) instructor contribution. ASPECT provides a rapid, easily administered means to measure student perception of engagement in an active-learning classroom. Gaining a better understanding of students' level of engagement will help inform instructor best practices and provide an additional measure for comprehensively assessing the impact of different active-learning strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 75 条
[31]  
Henningsen A, 2016, PACKAGE CENSREG, P1
[32]  
Henningsen Arne., 2011, Estimating Censored Regression Models in R using the censReg Package
[33]   The four-phase model of interest development [J].
Hidi, Suzanne ;
Renninger, K. Ann .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2006, 41 (02) :111-127
[34]  
Hora M., 2010, Teaching Dimensions Observation Protocol (TDOP)
[35]   Using innovative learning technologies to promote learning and engagement in an urban science classroom [J].
Hug, B ;
Krajcik, JS ;
Marx, RW .
URBAN EDUCATION, 2005, 40 (04) :446-472
[36]   Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis [J].
Hulleman, Chris S. ;
Durik, Amanda M. ;
Schweigert, Shaun A. ;
Harackiewicz, Judith M. .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 100 (02) :398-416
[37]   The case of Carla:: Dilemmas of helping all students to understand science [J].
Kurth, LA ;
Anderson, CW ;
Palincsar, AS .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2002, 86 (03) :287-313
[38]   The effect of active learning methods on student retention in engineering statistics [J].
Kvam, PH .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2000, 54 (02) :136-140
[39]  
Lane Erin S., 2015, Journal of College Science Teaching, V44, P83, DOI DOI 10.2505/4/JCST15_044_06_83
[40]  
Lave J., 1991, Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation