Perspectives of deprived patients on diabetes self-management programmes delivered by the local primary care team: a qualitative study on facilitators and barriers for participation, in France

被引:14
作者
Allory, Emmanuel [1 ,2 ]
Lucas, Helene [1 ]
Maury, Arnaud [1 ,2 ]
Garlantezec, Ronan [3 ]
Kendir, Candan [4 ]
Chapron, Anthony [1 ,2 ]
Fiquet, Laure [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rennes 1, Dept Gen Practice, F-35000 Rennes, France
[2] Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, INSERM, CIC 1414 Ctr Invest Clin, F-35000 Rennes, France
[3] Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, Irset Inst Rech Sante Environm & Travail, INSERM,EHESP,UMR S 1085, F-35000 Rennes, France
[4] Ecole Hautes Etud Sante Publ EHESP, St Denis, France
关键词
Self-management; Patient education as topic; Vulnerable population; Diabetes mellitus; Primary health care;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-020-05715-3
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is an effective intervention for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); nevertheless, patient participation in this type of programme is low. Implementation of DSME programmes in primary care practices by the local multi-professional team is a potential strategy to improve access to DSME for T2DM patients. The aim of this study was to identify perceived facilitators and barriers by patients to participation in local DSME delivered by primary care professionals in France. Method: T2DM patients, informed and recruited during consulting with their usual care provider, who had attended a structured and validated DSME programme delivered by 13 primary care providers within a multi-professional primary care practice in a deprived area of 20,000 inhabitants, were invited to participate in this study. A qualitative study with semi-structured, in-depth interviews was conducted with study participants, between July 2017 and February 2018. A reflexive thematic analysis of the interviews was carried out. Coding schemes were developed to generate thematic trends in patient descriptions of facilitators and barriers to DSME participation. Results: Nineteen interviews (mean length 31 min; [20-44 min]) were completed with T2DM patients. Four themes on facilitators for programme participation emerged from the data: geographical proximity of a DSME programme held in the local multi-professional primary care practice; effective promotion of the DSME programme by the local multi-professional team; pre-existing relationship between patients and their healthcare providers; and potential to establish new social interactions within the neighbourhood by participating in the programme. Three themes on barriers to attendance emerged: integrating the DSME programme into their own schedules; difficulties in expressing themselves in front of a group; and keeping the motivation for self-managing their T2DM. Conclusions: From the patient perspective, the programme geographical proximity and the pre-existing patient-healthcare provider relationship were important factors that contributed to participation. Healthcare providers should consider these factors to improve access to DSME programmes and diabetes self-management in deprived populations. Longitudinal studies should be performed to measure the impact of these programmes.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Analysis of the 2004-2007 literature on therapeutic patient education in diabetes: results and trends [J].
Albano, M. G. ;
Crozet, C. ;
d'Ivernois, J. F. .
ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2008, 45 (04) :211-219
[2]   Patient and Provider Dilemmas of Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management: A Qualitative Study in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Communities in Stockholm [J].
Aweko, Juliet ;
De Man, Jeroen ;
Absetz, Pilvikki ;
Ostenson, Claes-Goran ;
Peterson, Stefan Swartling ;
Alvesson, Helle Moelsted ;
Daivadanam, Meena .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (09)
[3]   Identifying Vulnerable Subpopulations for Climate Change Health Effects in the United States [J].
Balbus, John M. ;
Malina, Catherine .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2009, 51 (01) :33-37
[4]  
Balcou-Debussche M., 2013, THER PATIENT ED, V5, P113, DOI [10.1051/tpe/2012020., DOI 10.1051/tpe/2012020]
[5]  
Bardsley J, 2017, DIABETES ED, V43, P14
[6]   Multidisciplinary coordinated care for Type 2 diabetes: A qualitative analysis of patient perspectives [J].
Berkowitz, Seth A. ;
Eisenstat, Stephanie A. ;
Barnard, Lily S. ;
Wexler, Deborah J. .
PRIMARY CARE DIABETES, 2018, 12 (03) :218-223
[7]   Association among individual deprivation, glycemic control and diabetes complications -: The EPICES score [J].
Bihan, H ;
Laurent, S ;
Sass, C ;
Nguyen, G ;
Huot, C ;
Moulin, JJ ;
Guegen, R ;
Le Toumelin, P ;
Le Clésiau, H ;
La Rosa, E ;
Reach, G ;
Cohen, R .
DIABETES CARE, 2005, 28 (11) :2680-2685
[8]   Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note [J].
Bowen, Glenn A. .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2008, 8 (01) :137-152
[9]  
Braun V., 2006, Qual. Res. Psychol., V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, DOI 10.1080/10875549.2021.1929659, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
[10]   Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis [J].
Braun, Virginia ;
Clarke, Victoria .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN SPORT EXERCISE AND HEALTH, 2019, 11 (04) :589-597