Clinical Management of Patients at Risk for Hereditary Breast Cancer with Variants of Uncertain Significance in the Era of Multigene Panel Testing

被引:21
作者
Chang, Jenny [1 ]
Seng, Sirivan [1 ]
Yoo, June [1 ]
Equivel, Pamela [1 ]
Lum, Sharon S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Loma Linda Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Surg Oncol, Loma Linda, CA 92354 USA
关键词
BRCA2; RECLASSIFICATION; OOPHORECTOMY; MASTECTOMY; GENE;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-019-07595-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Rising use of multigene panel testing has led to increased identification of variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Consensus guidelines state that clinicians should not make medical management decisions based on VUS findings. We sought to analyze how VUS affect management of patients at risk for hereditary breast cancer. Methods All genetic testing reports for indications of hereditary breast cancer risk from a single tertiary-care institution from 2015 to 2018 were reviewed. Variants were grouped by pathogenicity (benign/likely benign, VUS, or pathogenic/likely pathogenic [P/LP]) and by breast cancer susceptibility (high, moderate, or none). Patient and management characteristics were compared by variant pathogenicity and breast cancer risk. Results Overall, 563 patients underwent genetic testing for breast cancer risk; 336 VUS were identified in 228 (40.5%) of patients of which 26.4% were in high or moderate penetrance genes. P/LP results were found in 61 (10.8%) patients, of which 61.2% were identified in breast-specific moderate and high penetrance genes, and 38.7% were found in non-breast specific genes. Of variants found in high-risk genes, 54.5% were P/LP and 45.5% were VUS. On multivariable analysis, prophylactic mastectomy was associated with younger age and personal history of cancer, but not variant pathogenicity or penetrance. There were no differences in the use of post-test imaging, oophorectomy, or colonoscopy based on variant findings or age. Conclusions In this era of multigene panel testing, genetic factors help to inform, but not dictate, complex decision-making in surveillance and management of patients at risk for hereditary breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:3389 / 3396
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Underdiagnosis of Hereditary Breast Cancer: Are Genetic Testing Guidelines a Tool or an Obstacle? [J].
Beitsch, Peter D. ;
Whitworth, Pat W. ;
Hughes, Kevin ;
Patel, Rakesh ;
Rosen, Barry ;
Compagnoni, Gia ;
Baron, Paul ;
Simmons, Rache ;
Smith, Linda Ann ;
Grady, Ian ;
Kinney, Michael ;
Coomer, Cynara ;
Barbosa, Karen ;
Holmes, Dennis R. ;
Brown, Eric ;
Gold, Linsey ;
Clark, Patricia ;
Riley, Lee ;
Lyons, Samuel ;
Ruiz, Antonio ;
Kahn, Sadia ;
MacDonald, Heather ;
Curcio, Lisa ;
Hardwick, Mary Kay ;
Yang, Shan ;
Esplin, Ed D. ;
Nussbaum, Robert L. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (06) :453-+
[2]   Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Consensus Statement from the American Society of Breast Surgeons: Additional Considerations and a Framework for Shared Decision Making [J].
Boughey, Judy C. ;
Attai, Deanna J. ;
Chen, Steven L. ;
Cody, Hiram S. ;
Dietz, Jill R. ;
Feldman, Sheldon M. ;
Greenberg, Caprice C. ;
Kass, Rena B. ;
Landercasper, Jeffrey ;
Lemaine, Valerie ;
MacNeill, Fiona ;
Margenthaler, Julie A. ;
Song, David H. ;
Staley, Alicia C. ;
Wilke, Lee G. ;
Willey, Shawna C. ;
Yao, Katharine A. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (10) :3106-3111
[3]   Risk-Reducing Mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers A Complex Discussion [J].
Domchek, Susan M. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 321 (01) :27-28
[4]   Gene-Panel Sequencing and the Prediction of Breast-Cancer Risk [J].
Easton, Douglas F. ;
Pharoah, Paul D. P. ;
Antoniou, Antonis C. ;
Tischkowitz, Marc ;
Tavtigian, Sean V. ;
Nathanson, Katherine L. ;
Devilee, Peter ;
Meindl, Alfons ;
Couch, Fergus J. ;
Southey, Melissa ;
Goldgar, David E. ;
Evans, Gareth R. ;
Chenevix-Trench, Georgia ;
Rahman, Nazneen ;
Robson, Mark ;
Domchek, Susan M. ;
Foulkes, William D. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 372 (23) :2243-2257
[5]   Understanding of BRCA VUS genetic results by breast cancer specialists [J].
Eccles, B. K. ;
Copson, E. ;
Maishman, T. ;
Abraham, J. E. ;
Eccles, D. M. .
BMC CANCER, 2015, 15
[6]   BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing-pitfalls and recommendations for managing variants of uncertain clinical significance [J].
Eccles, D. M. ;
Mitchell, G. ;
Monteiro, A. N. A. ;
Schmutzler, R. ;
Couch, F. J. ;
Spurdle, A. B. ;
Gomez-Garcia, E. B. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26 (10) :2057-2065
[7]   Differences Among a Modern Cohort of BRCA Mutation Carriers Choosing Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomies Compared to Breast Surveillance [J].
Gilbert, Elizabeth ;
Zabor, Emily C. ;
Stempel, Michelle ;
Mangino, Debra ;
Heerdt, Alexandra ;
Pilewskie, Melissa .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 (10) :3048-3054
[8]   Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing The Implications of the US FDA's First Marketing Authorization for BRCA Mutation Testing [J].
Gill, Jennifer ;
Obley, Adam J. ;
Prasad, Vinay .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 319 (23) :2377-2378
[9]   LINKAGE OF EARLY-ONSET FAMILIAL BREAST-CANCER TO CHROMOSOME-17Q21 [J].
HALL, JM ;
LEE, MK ;
NEWMAN, B ;
MORROW, JE ;
ANDERSON, LA ;
HUEY, B ;
KING, MC .
SCIENCE, 1990, 250 (4988) :1684-1689
[10]   Trends in use of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy vs high-risk surveillance in unaffected carriers of inherited breast cancer syndromes in the Inherited Cancer Registry (ICARE) [J].
Henry, Danielle A. ;
Lee, Marie C. ;
Almanza, Deanna ;
Ahmed, Kamran A. ;
Sun, Weihong ;
Boulware, David C. ;
Laronga, Christine .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2019, 174 (01) :39-45