Effects of post-scenario debriefing versus stop-and-go debriefing in medical simulation training on skill acquisition and learning experience: a randomized controlled trial

被引:26
作者
Schober, Patrick [1 ]
Kistemaker, Kay R. J. [2 ]
Sijani, Fereshte [3 ]
Schwarte, Lothar A. [1 ]
van Groeningen, Dick [1 ]
Krage, Ralf [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Anesthesiol, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Noordwest Ziekenhuisgrp, Dept Cardiol, Alkmaar, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Medical education; Debriefing; Simulation; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; LIFE-SUPPORT; HEALTH-CARE; PERFORMANCE; CONFIDENCE; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-019-1772-y
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background Debriefing is a critical component to promote effective learning during simulation-based training. Traditionally, debriefing is provided only after the end of a scenario. A possible alternative is to debrief specific portions during an ongoing simulation session (stop-and-go debriefing). While this alternative has theoretical advantages, it is not commonly used due to concerns that interruptions disturb the fidelity and adversely affect learning. However, both approaches have not been rigorously compared, and effects on skill acquisition and learning experience are unknown. Methods We randomly assigned 50 medical students participating in a simulation-based cardiopulmonary resuscitation training to either a post-scenario debriefing or stop-and-go debriefing. After four weeks, participants performed a repeat scenario, and their performance was assessed using a generic performance score (primary outcome). A difference of 3 or more points was considered meaningful. A 5-item questionnaire was used to assess the subjective learning experience and the perceived stress level (secondary outcomes). Results There was no significant difference between the groups for the performance score (mean difference: -0.35, 95%CI: -2.46 to 1.77, P = 0.748, n = 48). The confidence limits excluding the specified relevant 3-point difference suggest equivalence of both techniques with respect to the primary outcome. No significant differences were observed for secondary outcomes. Conclusions Stop-and-go debriefing does not adversely affect skill acquisition compared to the classic post-scenario debriefing strategy. This finding is reassuring when interruptions are deemed necessary and gives simulation instructors the latitude to tailor the timing of the debriefing individually, rather than adhering to the unsupported dogma that scenarios should not be interrupted.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Training and simulation for patient safety [J].
Aggarwal, Rajesh ;
Mytton, Oliver T. ;
Derbrew, Milliard ;
Hananel, David ;
Heydenburg, Mark ;
Issenberg, Barry ;
MacAulay, Catherine ;
Mancini, Mary Elizabeth ;
Morimoto, Takeshi ;
Soper, Nathaniel ;
Ziv, Amitai ;
Reznick, Richard .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2010, 19 :i34-43
[2]   Use of the learning conversation improves instructor confidence in life support training: An open randomised controlled cross-over trial comparing teaching feedback mechanisms [J].
Baldwin, Lydia J. L. ;
Jones, Christopher M. ;
Hulme, Jonathan ;
Owen, Andrew .
RESUSCITATION, 2015, 96 :199-207
[3]  
Bullock I., 2016, Pocket guide to teaching for clinical instructors, V3, P59
[4]   The Foundation Programme assessment tools: An opportunity to enhance feedback to trainees? [J].
Carr, S. .
POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 82 (971) :576-579
[5]   Learners' Experiences During Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Simulations A Qualitative Analysis [J].
Chancey, Rebecca J. ;
Sampayo, Esther M. ;
Lemke, Daniel S. ;
Doughty, Cara B. .
SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2019, 14 (01) :18-28
[6]   Successful debriefing - Best methods to achieve positive learning outcomes A literature review [J].
Dufrene, Claudine ;
Young, Anne .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2014, 34 (03) :372-376
[7]   Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS) Development and Rationale for a Blended Approach to Health Care Simulation Debriefing [J].
Eppich, Walter ;
Cheng, Adam .
SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2015, 10 (02) :106-115
[8]  
Fanning Ruth M, 2007, Simul Healthc, V2, P115, DOI 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3180315539
[9]   Debriefing after simulation-based non-technical skill training in healthcare: a systematic review of effective practice [J].
Garden, A. L. ;
Le Fevre, D. M. ;
Waddington, H. L. ;
Weller, J. M. .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2015, 43 (03) :300-308
[10]   Pediatric resident resuscitation skills improve after "Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice" training [J].
Hunt, Elizabeth A. ;
Duval-Arnould, Jordan M. ;
Nelson-McMillan, Kristen L. ;
Bradshaw, Jamie Haggerty ;
Diener-West, Marie ;
Perretta, Julianne S. ;
Shilkofski, Nicole A. .
RESUSCITATION, 2014, 85 (07) :945-951