The Safety and Efficacy of Phage Therapy for Superficial Bacterial Infections: A Systematic Review

被引:48
作者
Steele, Angharad [1 ]
Stacey, Helen J. [2 ]
de Soir, Steven [3 ,4 ]
Jones, Joshua D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Infect Med, Edinburgh Med Sch, Biomed Sci, Chancellors Bldg,49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh Med Sch, Chancellors Bldg,49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Queen Astrid Mil Hosp, Lab Mol & Cellular Technol, Rue Bruyn, B-1120 Brussels, Belgium
[4] Univ Catholique Louvain UCLouvain, Cellular & Mol Pharmacol, Louvain Drug Res Inst, Ave E Mounier 73, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
来源
ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL | 2020年 / 9卷 / 11期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
burn wound infection; chronic wound infection; diabetic foot infection; phage therapy; superficial infection; systematic review; SOFT-TISSUE INFECTIONS; BACTERIOPHAGE TREATMENT; SUSTAINED-RELEASE; SKIN; ACNE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; PATHOGENESIS;
D O I
10.3390/antibiotics9110754
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Superficial bacterial infections, such as dermatological, burn wound and chronic wound/ulcer infections, place great human and financial burdens on health systems globally and are often complicated by antibiotic resistance. Bacteriophage (phage) therapy is a promising alternative antimicrobial strategy with a 100-year history of successful application. Here, we report a systematic review of the safety and efficacy of phage therapy for the treatment of superficial bacterial infections. Three electronic databases were systematically searched for articles that reported primary data about human phage therapy for dermatological, burn wound or chronic wound/ulcer infections secondary to commonly causative bacteria. Two authors independently assessed study eligibility and performed data extraction. Of the 27 eligible reports, eight contained data on burn wound infection (n = 156), 12 on chronic wound/ulcer infection (n = 327) and 10 on dermatological infections (n = 1096). Cautionary pooled efficacy estimates from the studies that clearly reported efficacy data showed clinical resolution or improvement in 77.5% (n = 111) of burn wound infections, 86.1% (n = 310) of chronic wound/ulcer infections and 94.14% (n = 734) of dermatological infections. Over half of the reports that commented on safety (n = 8/15), all published in or after 2002, did not express safety concerns. Seven early reports (1929-1987), described adverse effects consistent with the administration of raw phage lysate and co-administered bacterial debris or broth. This review strongly suggests that the use of purified phage to treat superficial bacterial infections can be highly effective and, by various routes of administration, is safe and without adverse effects.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Bacteriophage Clinical Use as Antibacterial "Drugs": Utility and Precedent [J].
Abedon, Stephen T. .
MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2017, 5 (04)
[2]  
Abedon Stephen T, 2011, Bacteriophage, V1, P66
[3]  
Abul-Hassan H.S., 1990, ANN MBC, V3, P4
[4]   Risk Factors for Nosocomial Infection and Mortality in Burn Patients: 10 Years of Experience at a University Hospital [J].
Alp, Emine ;
Coruh, Atilla ;
Gunay, Galip K. ;
Yontar, Yalcin ;
Doganay, Mehmet .
JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & RESEARCH, 2012, 33 (03) :379-385
[5]  
American Academy of Dermatology, SKIN INF NUMB
[6]  
American Academy of Dermatology, SKIN ULC WOUNDS BURN
[7]  
Aslam S., 2018, OPEN FORUM INFECT DI, V5, pS47, DOI [10.1093/ofid/ofy209.112, DOI 10.1093/OFID/OFY209.112]
[8]  
BAKER A G, 1963, Pa Med J, V66, P25
[9]  
Bassetti Matteo, 2018, Drugs Context, V7, P212527, DOI 10.7573/dic.212527
[10]  
Bernstein V.S., 1940, SURG KHIRURGIA, P56