Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring of Agricultural Structures

被引:29
作者
Maraveas, Chrysanthos [1 ]
Bartzanas, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Patras, Dept Civil Engn, Patras 26500, Greece
[2] Agr Univ Athens, Dept Nat Resources & Agr Engn, Athens 11855, Greece
关键词
sensors; agricultural structures; health diagnosis; CONCRETE REPAIR MATERIALS; GRANULAR FLOW; IN-SITU; DURABILITY; DESIGN; SYSTEM; BRIDGE; ATTACK; STEEL; SILO;
D O I
10.3390/s21010314
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The health diagnosis of agricultural structures is critical to detecting damages such as cracks in concrete, corrosion, spalling, and delamination. Agricultural structures are susceptible to environmental degradation due to frequent exposure to water, organic effluent, farm chemicals, structural loading, and unloading. Various sensors have been employed for accurate and real-time monitoring of agricultural building structures, including electrochemical, ultrasonic, fiber-optic, piezoelectric, wireless, fiber Bragg grating sensors, and self-sensing concrete. The cost-benefits of each type of sensor and utility in a farm environment are explored in the review. Current literature suggests that the functionality of sensors has improved with progress in technology. Notable improvements made with the progress in technology include better accuracy of the measurements, reduction of signal-to-noise ratio, and transmission speed, and the deployment of machine learning, deep learning, and artificial intelligence in smart IoT-based agriculture. Key challenges include inconsistent installation of sensors in farm structures, technical constraints, and lack of support infrastructure, awareness, and preference for traditional inspection methods.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 32
页数:31
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]   Effect of sewage wastes on the physico-mechanical properties of cement and reinforced steel [J].
Abd El-Aziz, Magdy A. ;
Sufe, Waleed H. .
AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2013, 4 (03) :387-391
[2]   Wireless sensor network for structural health monitoring: A contemporary review of technologies, challenges, and future direction [J].
Abdulkarem, Mohammed ;
Samsudin, Khairulmizam ;
Rokhani, Fakhrul Zaman ;
Rasid, Mohd Fadlee .
STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2020, 19 (03) :693-735
[3]   IoT sensors for modern structural health monitoring. A new frontier. [J].
Abruzzese, Donato ;
Micheletti, Andrea ;
Tiero, Alessandro ;
Cosentino, Manuel ;
Forconi, Damiano ;
Grizzi, Gianmarco ;
Scarano, Gianluca ;
Vuth, Sreymom ;
Abiuso, Pierluigi .
1ST VIRTUAL CONFERENCE ON STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY (VCSI1), 2020, 25 :378-385
[4]  
Agrawal H., 2016, Intelligent Systems Technologies and Applications 2016, s, P355, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-47952-1_28
[5]   Heating demand and economic feasibility analysis for year-round vegetable production in Canadian Prairies greenhouses [J].
Ahamed M.S. ;
Guo H. ;
Taylor L. ;
Tanino K. .
Information Processing in Agriculture, 2019, 6 (01) :81-90
[6]   Greenhouse Monitoring with Wireless Sensor Network [J].
Ahonen, Teemu ;
Virrankoski, Reino ;
Elmusrati, Mohammed .
PROCEEDINGS OF 2008 IEEE/ASME INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHATRONIC AND EMBEDDED SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, 2008, :403-408
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, P 5 INT C DUR CONCR, DOI DOI 10.5703/1288284315429
[8]   Structural health monitoring using extremely compressed data through deep learning [J].
Azimi, Mohsen ;
Pekcan, Gokhan .
COMPUTER-AIDED CIVIL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2020, 35 (06) :597-614
[9]   Response of concrete to accelerated physical salt attack exposure [J].
Bassuoni, M. T. ;
Rahman, M. M. .
CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2016, 79 :395-408
[10]   Modelling acid attack on concrete: Part II. A computer model [J].
Beddoe, Robin E. .
CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2016, 88 :20-35