Factors influencing the degree of participation in surgical decision-making among Chinese patients with prostate cancer: A qualitative research

被引:3
|
作者
Cao, Jie [1 ]
Peng, Chunxue [1 ]
Lu, Xiaoying [2 ]
Zhou, Lingjun [3 ]
Wu, Jing [3 ]
机构
[1] Naval Med Univ, Changhai Hosp, Dept Urol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Naval Med Univ, Changhai Hosp, Dept Nursing, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Naval Med Univ, Sch Nursing, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Prostate cancer; Participation; Decision-making; Surgery; Influence factors; Qualitative research;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajur.2021.08.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: There was increasingly demand of participation in surgical decision-making among Chinese patients with prostate cancer. However, due to the complex healthcare system and advanced care settings, it is quite challenging for the patients to gain sufficient support from the institute and the government. This research aimed to investigate the factors that impact the degree of participation in surgical decision-making among Chinese prostate cancer patients. Methods: A phenomenological approach of qualitative research based on the results of semi-structured interviews was adopted, to explore the influencing factors which hinder the partic-ipation in surgical decision-making. Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research were utilized. Up to 160 post-operative patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy along with 68 medical and nursing staffs, were purposively recruited in this research. This retrospective study was carried out from September 2018 to August 2019. After recording and transcribing the interviews, the interview materials were evaluated via the Colaizzi's seven step approach and the NVivo Version 10 software to analyze the interview content. Results: According to the analysis and summary of the interviews, there were three factors affecting the degree of participation in surgical decision-making. Firstly, insufficient informa-tion was provided by medical and nursing staffs because of their lack of time, proper commu-nication skills, and career experience, as well as difficulties in the development of patient decision aid and inconsistent resource availability. Secondly, the cognitive level of decision-making among patients was relatively low due to poor psychological endurance, insufficient amount of education, senility, and less knowledge and information demand. Ultimately, decisions were constantly made by family members with/without patients. Conclusions: The degree of participation of Chinese prostate cancer patients in the surgical decision-making had much space for improvement. 2022 Editorial Office of Asian Journal of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 185
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prostate Cancer on the Web—Expedient Tool for Patients’ Decision-Making?
    Hendrik Borgmann
    Jan-Henning Wölm
    Stefan Vallo
    Rene Mager
    Johannes Huber
    Johannes Breyer
    Johannes Salem
    Stacy Loeb
    Axel Haferkamp
    Igor Tsaur
    Journal of Cancer Education, 2017, 32 : 135 - 140
  • [42] Mechanisms of decision-making in preoperative assessment for older adult prostate cancer patients-A qualitative study
    Kierkegaard, Patrick
    Vale, Mira D.
    Garrison, Spencer
    Hollenbeck, Brent K.
    Hollingsworth, John M.
    Owen-Smith, Jason
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 121 (03) : 561 - 569
  • [43] Primary Breast Cancer Decision-making Among Chinese American Women Satisfaction, Regret
    Lee, Shiu-yu C. Katie
    Knobf, M. Tish
    NURSING RESEARCH, 2015, 64 (05) : 391 - 401
  • [44] Treatment decision making in prostate cancer: Patients' participation in complex decisions
    Fischer, Maarten
    Visser, Adriaan
    Voerman, Bert
    Garssen, Bert
    van Andel, George
    Bensing, Jozien
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2006, 63 (03) : 308 - 313
  • [45] Factors influencing treatment decision-making for cancer patients in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review
    Salek, Marta
    Silverstein, Allison
    Tilly, Alyssa
    Gassant, Pascale Yola
    Gunasekera, Sanjeeva
    Hordofa, Diriba Fufa
    Hesson, Donna
    Duffy, Caitlyn
    Malik, Nauman
    McNeil, Michael
    Force, Lisa M.
    Bhakta, Nickhill
    Rodin, Danielle
    Kaye, Erica C.
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (17): : 18133 - 18152
  • [46] Exploring the medical decision-making patterns and influencing factors among the general Chinese public: a binary logistic regression analysis
    Lyu, Yuwen
    Xu, Qian
    Liu, Junrong
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [47] Factors influencing older women's decision-making related to treatment of operable breast cancer: A qualitative systematic review
    Malcolm, Francesca Ligori
    Howard, Penny
    Klukowska, Anita Maria
    Minhas, Nikita
    Parks, Ruth Mary
    Cheung, Kwok Leung
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2024, 33 (01)
  • [48] Decision-making by Adolescents and Parents of Children With Cancer Regarding Health Research Participation
    Read, Kate
    Fernandez, Conrad Vincent
    Gao, Jun
    Strahlendorf, Caron
    Moghrabi, Albert
    Pentz, Rebecca Davis
    Barfield, Raymond Carlton
    Baker, Justin Nathaniel
    Santor, Darcy
    Weijer, Charles
    Kodish, Eric
    PEDIATRICS, 2009, 124 (03) : 959 - 965
  • [49] The mediating role of decision-making conflict in the association between patient?s participation satisfaction and distress during medical decision-making among Chinese patients with pulmonary nodules
    Yuan, Jingmin
    Wang, Jing
    Sun, Yan
    Zhou, Hong
    Li, Dan
    Zhang, Jia
    Ren, Xiaoxiao
    Chen, Mingwei
    Ren, Hui
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2022, 105 (12) : 3466 - 3472
  • [50] Assessment of the Decision-Making Capacity for Clinical Research Participation in Patients With Advanced Cancer in the Last Weeks of Life
    Goswami, Rachna
    Moore, Jessica
    Bruera, Eduardo
    Hui, David
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2020, 60 (02) : 400 - 406