Development of Concrete Mixture Design Process Using MCDM Approach for Sustainable Concrete Quality Management

被引:12
作者
Ahmed, Mohd [1 ]
Mallick, Javed [1 ]
AlQadhi, Saeed [1 ]
Ben Kahla, Nabil [1 ]
机构
[1] King Khalid Univ, Coll Engn, Civil Engn Dept, Abha 6144, Saudi Arabia
关键词
sustainable quality management; concrete mixture parameters; mixture design method; Fuzzy TOPSIS; multicriteria decision-making; DECISION-MAKING METHODS; SELECTION; TOPSIS; CRITERIA; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/su12198110
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The development of a concrete mixture design process for high-quality concrete production with sustainable values is a complex process because of the multiple required properties at the green/hardened state of concrete and the interdependency of concrete mixture parameters. A new multicriteria decision making (MCDM) technique based on Technique of Order Preference Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methodology is applied to a fuzzy setting for the selection of concrete mix factors and concrete mixture design methods with the aim towards sustainable concrete quality management. Three objective properties for sustainable quality concrete are adopted as criteria in the proposed MCDM model. The seven most dominant concrete mixture parameters with consideration to sustainable concrete quality issues, i.e., environmental (density, durability) and socioeconomic criteria (cost, optimum mixture ingredients ratios), are proposed as sub-criteria. Three mixture design techniques that have potentiality to include sustainable aspects in their design procedure, two advanced and one conventional concrete mixture design method, are taken as alternatives in the MCDM model. The proposed selection support framework may be utilized in updating concrete design methods for sustainability and in deciding the most dominant concrete mix factors that can provide sustainable quality management in concrete production as well as in concrete construction. The concrete mix factors found to be most influential to produce sustainable concrete quality include the water/cement ratio and density. The outcomes of the proposed MCDM model of fuzzy TOPSIS are consistent with the published literature and theory. The DOE method was found to be more suitable in sustainable concrete quality management considering its applicable objective quality properties and concrete mix factors.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Ahmad S, 2007, ARAB J SCI ENG, V32, P27
[2]   Decision Support Model for Design of High-Performance Concrete Mixtures Using Two-Phase AHP-TOPSIS Approach [J].
Ahmed, Mohd. ;
Qureshi, M. N. ;
Mallick, Javed ;
Hasan, Mohd. Abul ;
Hussain, Mahmoud .
ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2019, 2019
[3]   A Comparative Study of Popular Concrete Mix Design Methods from Qualitative and Cost-Effective Point of View for Extreme Environment [J].
Ahmed, Mohd. ;
Islam, Saiful ;
Nazar, Sohaib ;
Khan, Roohul A. .
ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 41 (04) :1403-1412
[4]   Multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects [J].
Akadiri, Peter O. ;
Olomolaiye, Paul O. ;
Chinyio, Ezekiel A. .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 30 :113-125
[5]  
Alam A., 2016, J MECH CIV ENG, DOI [10.9790/1684-1303038998, DOI 10.9790/1684-1303038998]
[6]   Construction Contractors Ranking Method Using Multiple Decision-Makers and Multiattribute Fuzzy Weighted Average [J].
Alhumaidi, H. M. .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 141 (04)
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2010, THESIS
[8]  
Bellman R. E., 1971, Decision-making in a fuzzy environment, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141
[9]   A multi-attribute decision making approach of mix design based on experimental soil characterization [J].
Bera, Amit K. ;
Mukhopadhyay, Tanmoy ;
Mohan, Ponnada J. ;
Dey, Tushar K. .
FRONTIERS OF STRUCTURAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2018, 12 (03) :361-371
[10]   Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Seismic Structural Retrofitting [J].
Caterino, N. ;
Iervolino, I. ;
Manfredi, G. ;
Cosenza, E. .
COMPUTER-AIDED CIVIL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2009, 24 (06) :432-445