首页
学术期刊
论文检测
AIGC检测
热点
更多
数据
What education reformers should do about collective bargaining
被引:0
作者
:
Rosenthal, Daniel M.
论文数:
0
引用数:
0
h-index:
0
机构:
Harvard Univ, Sch Law, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Harvard Univ, Sch Law, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
Rosenthal, Daniel M.
[
1
]
机构
:
[1]
Harvard Univ, Sch Law, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
来源
:
PHI DELTA KAPPAN
|
2014年
/ 95卷
/ 05期
关键词
:
D O I
:
10.1177/003172171409500513
中图分类号
:
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
:
040101 ;
120403 ;
摘要
:
Restrictions on collective bargaining are spreading. But while reformers are right to question current labor practices in education, they're wrong to believe that bargaining prohibitions will solve the problems. A smarter approach would begin by putting down the sledgehammer wielded in Wisconsin and picking up a scalpel by pushing for laws aimed at two goals: (a) Clarifying or expanding the category of permissive bargaining topics, without eliminating mandatory bargaining on fundamental terms and conditions of employment; and (b) Ensuring that collective bargaining is transparent and that local government officials are accountable for their decisions in bargaining. Reformers should also focus on advocacy for policy change at the local level. © 2014.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 62
页数:5
相关论文
共 2 条
[1]
Moe T.M., 2011, SPECIAL INTEREST TEA, V1st
[2]
Rosenthal D.M., 2013, Oregon Law Review, V91, P673
←
1
→
共 2 条
[1]
Moe T.M., 2011, SPECIAL INTEREST TEA, V1st
[2]
Rosenthal D.M., 2013, Oregon Law Review, V91, P673
←
1
→