Residue Harvest Effects on Irrigated, No-Till Corn Yield and Nitrogen Response

被引:14
作者
Wortmann, Charles S. [1 ]
Shapiro, Charles A. [1 ]
Schmer, Marty R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Agron & Hort, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, USDA ARS, Grain Forage & Bioenergy Res Unit, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
关键词
SOIL CARBON; MANAGEMENT; REMOVAL; STOVER; NEBRASKA; ENERGY; GRAIN; CROP;
D O I
10.2134/agronj2015.0361
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Crop residue harvest occurs on about 40% of Nebraska's 3,700,000 ha of corn (Zea mays L.) land, primarily for feeding of beef cattle. Immobilization of applied N is expected to be less with residue harvest due to reduced microbial activity for digestion of high C/N ratio organic material. Residue reduction may affect subsequent crop yield and response to applied N. Field research was conducted at three locations over 2 yr in eastern Nebraska for irrigated, no-till corn following corn to determine residue harvest effects on yield and the economically optimal nitrogen rate (EONR). Study sites had deep silt loam or silty clay loam soil with good water infiltration and plant-available water holding capacity. Mean aboveground biomass N content, applied N recovery efficiency, and grain yield were 22, 43, and 20% higher with >75% residue removal compared with no residue removal. Agronomic efficiency of applied N use was not consistently affected. The residue removal effects were oft en greater in the third compared with second year of continuous corn. The residue removal effect on EONR was not consistent over site-years, and the mean reduction in EONR with residue removal was between 10 and 20 kg ha(-1). While removal of some corn residue is expected to result in higher yield of the following corn crop, reduction in applied N need cannot be well predicted before planting.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 390
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Alternative Fuels Data Center, 2014, ETH FEEDST
[2]  
Biomass Research and Development Board, 2009, INCR FEEDST PROD BIO
[3]   Influence of Corn Residue Harvest Management on Grain, Stover, and Energy Yields [J].
Cantrell, Keri B. ;
Novak, Jeffrey M. ;
Frederick, James R. ;
Karlen, Douglas L. ;
Watts, Donald W. .
BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2014, 7 (02) :590-597
[4]   Continuous Corn Response to Residue Management and Nitrogen Fertilization [J].
Coulter, Jeffrey A. ;
Naftiger, Emerson D. .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2008, 100 (06) :1774-1780
[5]   Nitrogen Response and Economics for Irrigated Corn in Nebraska [J].
Dobermann, A. ;
Wortmann, C. S. ;
Ferguson, R. B. ;
Hergert, G. W. ;
Shapiro, C. A. ;
Tarkalson, D. D. ;
Walters, D. T. .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2011, 103 (01) :67-75
[6]  
DuPont Cellulosic Ethanol, 2012, DUPONT CORN STOV HAR
[7]  
Gavlak R.G., 2005, SOIL PLANT WATER REF, P153
[8]   Stover Removal Affects No-Till Irrigated Corn Yields, Soil Carbon, and Nitrogen [J].
Halvorson, Ardell D. ;
Stewart, Catherine E. .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2015, 107 (04) :1504-1512
[9]  
Karlen DL, 2014, BIOENERG RES, V7, P528, DOI [10.1007/s12155-014-9407-y, 10.1007/s12155-014-9419-7]
[10]   Maize is a critically important source of food, feed, energy and forage in the USA [J].
Klopfenstein, T. J. ;
Erickson, G. E. ;
Berger, L. L. .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2013, 153 :5-11