The ethics of scholarly publishing: exploring differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication across nations

被引:69
作者
Amos, Kathleen A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Publ Hlth Fdn, Council Linkages Acad & Publ Hlth Practice, Washington, DC 20005 USA
关键词
RETRACTIONS; MISCONDUCT; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.3163/1536-5050.102.2.005
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
This study explored national differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication in retracted biomedical literature. The national affiliations of authors and reasons for retraction of papers accessible through PubMed that were published from 2008 to 2012 and subsequently retracted were determined in order to identify countries with the largest numbers and highest rates of retraction due to plagiarism and duplicate publication. Authors from more than fifty countries retracted papers. While the United States retracted the most papers, China retracted the most papers for plagiarism and duplicate publication. Rates of plagiarism and duplicate publication were highest in Italy and Finland, respectively. Unethical publishing practices cut across nations.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 91
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[21]   The Boldt debacle [J].
Tramer, Martin R. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2011, 28 (06) :393-395
[22]   THE TROUBLE WITH RETRACTIONS [J].
Van Noorden, Richard .
NATURE, 2011, 478 (7367) :26-28
[23]   Plagiarism, retraction and the future [J].
Van Steirteghem, Andre ;
Williams, A. C. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 (08) :1940-1940
[24]   Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) [J].
Wager, E. ;
Barbour, V. ;
Yentis, S. ;
Kleinert, S. .
OBESITY REVIEWS, 2010, 11 (01) :64-66
[25]   Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008 [J].
Wager, Elizabeth ;
Williams, Peter .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2011, 37 (09) :567-570
[26]   Another kind of ethics: from corrections to retractions [J].
Yentis, S. M. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 65 (12) :1163-1166