Surgical Education Module Improves Operative Proficiency in Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: A Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial of Trainees

被引:14
|
作者
Kempton, Steve J. [1 ]
Salyapongse, A. Neil [1 ]
Israel, Jacqueline S. [1 ]
Mandel, Benjamin A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Hosp & Clin, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Madison, WI 53792 USA
关键词
simulation; carpal tunnel; resident education; hand surgery; AMERICAN SOCIETY; TECHNICAL SKILL; SURGERY; EXPERIENCE; SIMULATION; RESIDENTS; MEMBERS; TRENDS; ROOM; HAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.08.004
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether an interactive endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) surgical education module can improve knowledge of surgical indications and improve procedural competency.& para;& para;DESIGN: An ECTR education module was developed and trainees at various level of training were enrolled and randomized to surgical module and nonmodule (control) groups. Subjects were instructed that they would be the primary surgeon performing an ECTR. A written assessment was administered before and after module completion or independent case preparation to test comprehension of the procedure. The senior author evaluated each subject's intraoperative performance using a 5-point scoring system. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square and paired t-tests.& para;& para;SETTING: This study took place at a tertiary care hospital at the University of Wisconsin.& para;& para;RESULTS: In all, 30 subjects were tested (15 surgical module and 15 nonmodule). There were no differences in prepreparation test scores between groups. Postpreparation test scores following use of the module were significantly higher compared to the nonmodule group. The average operation performance scores for the surgical module group and nonmodule group were 96% and 82%, respectively. The surgical module group performed significantly better on all operative steps except for dressing application. Surgical module subjects without prior ECTR experience (n = 7) had operative scores that were significantly higher than those for nonmodule subjects without previous ECTR experience (n = 8) (95% vs. 75%). There was no difference in operative scores between surgical module subjects with no prior experience (n = 7) and nonmodule subjects who had performed at least 1 prior case (n = 7) (95% vs. 89%).& para;& para;CONCLUSIONS: The use of an ECTR surgical education module demonstrates a significant benefit in ECTR-naive subjects. When compared to subjects with previous ECTR experience, ECTR-naive subjects trained using the surgical module demonstrate better familiarity with the equipment and equivalent performance of the procedure. (C) 2017 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:442 / 449
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: A randomized trial
    MacDermid, JC
    Richards, RS
    Roth, JH
    Ross, DC
    King, GJW
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 28A (03): : 475 - 480
  • [2] Photobiomodulation Therapy in Carpal Tunnel Release: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Chuah, Jia Peng
    Khoo, Saw Sian
    Chung, Tze Yang
    Jayaletchumi, Gunasagaran
    PHOTOBIOMODULATION PHOTOMEDICINE AND LASER SURGERY, 2023, 41 (08) : 402 - 407
  • [3] A randomized controlled trial of Knifelight and open carpal tunnel release
    Bhattacharya, R
    Birdsall, PD
    Finn, P
    Stothard, J
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2004, 29B (02) : 113 - 115
  • [4] Outcomes of Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery With Home Guided Hand Therapy Versus No Hand Therapy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial After Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release
    Schroeder, Jake
    Malige, Ajith
    Rodriguez, William
    Liongson, Franzes
    Matullo, Kristofer
    HAND-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HAND SURGERY, 2024, 19 (01): : 136 - 142
  • [5] Surgical Priming Improves Operative Performance in Surgical Trainees: A Crossover Randomized Control Trial
    Feeley, Aoife A.
    Feeley, Iain H.
    Merghani, Khalid
    Sheehan, Eoin
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 80 (03) : 420 - 427
  • [6] Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release for idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zuo, Dongqing
    Zhou, Zifei
    Wang, Hongsheng
    Liao, Yuxin
    Zheng, Longpo
    Hua, Yingqi
    Cai, Zhengdong
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2015, 10
  • [7] Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release for idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Dongqing Zuo
    Zifei Zhou
    Hongsheng Wang
    Yuxin Liao
    Longpo Zheng
    Yingqi Hua
    Zhengdong Cai
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 10
  • [8] Open versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Sayegh, Eli T.
    Strauch, Robert J.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 473 (03) : 1120 - 1132
  • [9] Comparison of postoperative pain after open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release: A randomized controlled study
    Orak, Mehmet Mufit
    Guemuestas, Seyit Ali
    Onay, Tolga
    Uludag, Serkan
    Bulut, Guven
    Boru, Uelkue Tuerk
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2016, 50 (01) : 65 - 69
  • [10] Pain and outcomes of carpal tunnel release under local anaesthetic with or without a tourniquet: a randomized controlled trial
    Iqbal, Hafiz J.
    Doorgakant, Ashtin
    Rehmatullah, Nader N. T.
    Ramavath, Ashok L.
    Pidikiti, Prasad
    Lipscombe, Stephen
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2018, 43 (08) : 808 - 812