Environmental information disclosure quality, media attention and debt financing costs: Evidence from Chinese heavy polluting listed companies

被引:186
作者
Luo, Wenbing [1 ]
Guo, Xiaoxin [2 ]
Zhong, Shihu [2 ]
Wang, Juanzhi [3 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ Commerce, Sch Accounting, Changsha 410205, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Publ Econ & Adm, Dept Investment, 777 Guoding Rd, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Xiangtan 411201, Peoples R China
关键词
Corporate environmental information disclosure quality; Media attention; Debt financing costs; Heavy pollution industries; Rankins CSR ratings; SIGNALING THEORY; CORPORATE; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.237
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Employing the data of 842 listed companies in the heavy pollution industries between 2014 and 2016, this paper applies the fixed effect regression model to reveal the impact of corporate environmental information disclosure quality and media attention on corporate debt financing costs. Results show that: corporate environmental information disclosure quality has a significant negative effect on the debt financing costs, every one unit increase in the company's environmental information disclosure quality will reduce the debt financing costs by 0.31%; the linear adjustment effect of the number of media reports on corporate environmental information disclosure quality and the debt financing costs level of listed companies is not significant, but there is a significant U-shaped mediating effect. Further, by distinguishing between the positive tone of media reported and the negative tone of media reported, this article finds that: the coefficient of the cross item Media_Pos x EID_Quality is -0.0162, but it is not significant, which indicating positive media coverage has little impact on the negative relationship between environmental disclosure quality and debt financing costs; while the coefficient of the cross item Media_Neg x EID_Quality is -0.0163, and it is significant at 10% level, which disclosing media's negative reports mitigate the impact of environmental information disclosure quality on reducing corporate debt financing costs. Finally, this paper presents some policy recommendations: government departments develop and implement corporate environmental information disclosure standards for heavily polluting industries; company should avoid the impression management of voluntary disclosure of environmental information; eliminate collusion between the media and the company in the heavy pollution industries. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 277
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Alvis K., 2013, J ACCOUNTING RES, V52, P541
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, ENTREP THEORY PRACT
[3]   Signalling Theory and Equilibrium in Strategic Management Research: An Assessment and a Research Agenda [J].
Bergh, Donald D. ;
Connelly, Brian L. ;
Ketchen, David J., Jr. ;
Shannon, Lu M. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2014, 51 (08) :1334-1360
[4]  
Bonetti P, 2014, 2373877 SSRN
[5]   Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures [J].
Certo, ST .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2003, 28 (03) :432-446
[6]   Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis [J].
Clarkson, Peter M. ;
Li, Yue ;
Richardson, Gordon D. ;
Vasvari, Florin P. .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2008, 33 (4-5) :303-327
[7]   Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment [J].
Connelly, Brian L. ;
Certo, S. Trevis ;
Ireland, R. Duane ;
Reutzel, Christopher R. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2011, 37 (01) :39-67
[8]  
Cormier D., 1999, Journal of Accounting, Auditing Finance, V14, P429, DOI [10.1177/0148558X9901400403, DOI 10.1177/0148558X9901400403]
[9]  
CUI X, 2016, SOFT SCI, V30, P74, DOI DOI 10.1038/LEU.2015.204
[10]   An exploration of NGO and media efforts to influence workplace practices and associated accountability within global supply chains [J].
Deegan, Craig ;
Islam, Muhammad Azizul .
BRITISH ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2014, 46 (04) :397-415