Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Course design, assessment and evaluation, and facilitation

被引:160
作者
Martin, Florence [1 ]
Ritzhaupt, Albert [2 ]
Kumar, Swapna [2 ]
Budhrani, Kiran [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Charlotte, 9201 Univ City Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[2] Univ Florida, 2423 Norman Hall,POB 117048, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
Award-winning faculty; Online teaching; Course design; Online assessment; Evaluation facilitation strategies; Qualitative research; INSTRUCTOR PRESENCE; PERCEPTIONS; EDUCATION; QUALITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.04.001
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to identify the course design, assessment and evaluation, and facilitation practices from the perspectives of award-winning online faculty. Aligned with this purpose, we developed a conceptual framework focused on online course design, assessment and evaluation, and facilitation; and review relevant literature in light of this framework. We interviewed eight award-winning online faculty members from across the United States. These faculty received online teaching awards from one of the following professional associations: Online Learning Consortium (OLC), Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT), or United States Distance Learning Association. Based on the interviews, it was found that online instructors use a systematic design process, backwards design, considered learner needs, and designed learner interaction during the design process. Faculty recommended using a variety of assessments, using traditional and authentic assessments and used rubrics to assess students, course templates and quality assurance process and surveys, learning analytics, and peer reviews for assessment and evaluation. Timely response and feedback, availability and presence, and periodic communication were some facilitation strategies the award-winning instructors used. We discuss these findings and provide suggestions for future research and practice. These findings can add to what is known about effective online teaching best practices, standards, and competencies.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 43
页数:10
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] Anderson T., 2004, Theory and Practice of Online Learning, V2, P109, DOI DOI 10.4018/978-1-59140-178-0.CH006
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2008, Q REV DIST ED
  • [3] [Anonymous], TURKISH ONLINE J DIS
  • [4] Bailey C.J., 2008, BEST PRACTICES ONLIN
  • [5] Effective pedagogical practices for online teaching: Perception of experienced instructors
    Bailey, Craig J.
    Card, Karen A.
    [J]. INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2009, 12 (3-4) : 152 - 155
  • [6] Online Course Design in Higher Education: A Review of National and Statewide Evaluation Instruments
    Baldwin, Sally
    Ching, Yu-Hui
    Hsu, Yu-Chang
    [J]. TECHTRENDS, 2018, 62 (01) : 46 - 57
  • [7] Banna Jinan, 2015, J Online Learn Teach, V11, P249
  • [8] Baran E., 2017, Learning, Design, and Technology: An International Compendium of Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, P1
  • [9] Baran E, 2014, TECHTRENDS, V58, P96
  • [10] Baran E, 2013, TEACH COLL REC, V115