Electrostatic interactions in an integral membrane protein

被引:54
|
作者
Johnson, ET [1 ]
Parson, WW [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Biochem, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/bi012131y
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The effects of charge-charge interactions on the midpoint reduction potential (E) of the primary electron donor (P) in the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides were investigated by introducing mutations of ionizable amino acids at selected sites. The mutations were designed to alter the electrostatic environment of P, a bacteriochlorophyll dimer, without greatly affecting its structure or molecular orbitals. Two arginine residues at homologous positions in the L and M subunits [residues (L135) and (M164)], Asp (L155), Tyr (L164), and Cys (L247) were changed independently. Arginine (L135) was replaced by Lys, Leu, Gln, or Glu; Arg (M164), by Leu or Glu; Asp (L155), by Asn; Tyr (L164), by Phe; and Cys (L247), by Lys or Asp. The R(L135)E/C(L247)K double mutant also was made. The shift in the E(m) of P/P(+) was measured in each mutant and was compared with the effect predicted by electrostatics calculations using several different computational approaches. A simple distance-dependent dielectric screening factor reproduced the effects remarkably well. By contrast, microscopic methods that considered the reaction field in the protein and solvent but did not include explicit counterions overestimated the changes in the E,, considerably. Including counterions for the charged residues reduced the calculated effects of the mutations in molecular dynamics calculations. The results show that electrostatic interactions of P with ionizable amino acid residues are strongly screened, and suggest that counterions make major contributions to this screening. The screening also could reflect penetration of water or other relaxations not taken into account because of incomplete sampling of configurational space.
引用
收藏
页码:6483 / 6494
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Use of G-protein fusions to monitor integral membrane protein–protein interactions in yeast
    Kathleen N. Ehrhard
    Jörg J. Jacoby
    Xin-Yuan Fu
    Reinhard Jahn
    Henrik G. Dohlman
    Nature Biotechnology, 2000, 18 : 1075 - 1079
  • [12] Large-scale identification of yeast integral membrane protein interactions
    Miller, JP
    Lo, RS
    Ben-Hur, A
    Desmarais, C
    Stagljar, I
    Noble, WS
    Fields, S
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (34) : 12123 - 12128
  • [13] The role of protein-membrane electrostatic interactions in the adaptive gating cycle of MscS
    Britt, Madolyn
    Moller, Elissa
    Anishkin, Andriy
    Sukharev, Sergei I.
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 122 (03) : 89A - 89A
  • [14] THE MYRISTOYL-ELECTROSTATIC SWITCH - A MODULATOR OF REVERSIBLE PROTEIN-MEMBRANE INTERACTIONS
    MCLAUGHLIN, S
    ADEREM, A
    TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES, 1995, 20 (07) : 272 - 276
  • [15] Protein chemistry at membrane interfaces: Non-additivity of electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions
    Ladokhin, AS
    White, SH
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2001, 309 (03) : 543 - 552
  • [16] ELECTROSTATIC INTERACTIONS AT PLASMA-MEMBRANE
    WRIGGLESWORTH, JM
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1975, 271 (912) : 273 - +
  • [17] Protein flexibility and electrostatic interactions
    Kumar, S
    Wolfson, HJ
    Nussinov, R
    IBM JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 45 (3-4) : 499 - 512
  • [18] Use of G-protein fusions to monitor integral membrane protein-protein interactions in yeast
    Ehrhard, KN
    Jacoby, JJ
    Fu, XY
    Jahn, R
    Dohlman, HG
    NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2000, 18 (10) : 1075 - 1079
  • [19] Use of G-protein fusions to monitor integral membrane protein-protein interactions in yeast
    Ehrhard, KN
    Jacoby, JJ
    Fu, XY
    Jahn, R
    Dohlman, HG
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2001, 15 (05): : A879 - A879
  • [20] Electrostatic aspects of protein-protein interactions
    Sheinerman, FB
    Norel, R
    Honig, B
    CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (02) : 153 - 159