Driving factors of CO2 emission inequality in China: The role of government expenditure

被引:70
作者
Fan, Wei [1 ]
Li, Li [1 ]
Wang, Feiran [2 ]
Li, Ding [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Publ Finance & Taxat, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Ctr China Fiscal Dev, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Inst Dev Studies, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Survey & Res Ctr China Household Finance, Chengdu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Emission inequality; Government expenditure; Driving factor; Decomposition analysis; Theil index;
D O I
10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101545
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
China has reached a consensus regarding the total control of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions; however, regional emission inequalities still exist. The reduction of carbon emissions is a public good and indicates a strong positive externality, which is difficult to solve within the market. Such reductions are highly dependent on governmental contributions. Therefore, using the Theil index and the logarithmic mean Divisia index decomposition approach, this paper integrates government expenditure into an analysis framework, investigating the driving factors of emission inequality and the status and changes of China's CO2 emission inequality from 2007 to 2015, attributing emission inequality to disparities in governmental expenditures, energy consumption, and other socioeconomic factors. The empirical results show that imbalances in economic development, population distribution, and energy structure were prerequisites for a regional emission inequality, while disparities in government expenditure also played an important role. Among these factors, disparities in the expenditure structure were the main cause for emission inequality. The findings of this paper provide guidelines for the government to set carbon emission reduction quota and implement reasonable differentiated emission reduction policies.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Effects of public and private expenditures on environmental pollution: A dynamic heterogeneous panel data analysis [J].
Adewuyi, Adeolu O. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 65 :489-506
[2]   A spatial-temporal decomposition approach to performance assessment in energy and emissions [J].
Ang, B. W. ;
Su, Bin ;
Wang, H. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 60 :112-121
[3]   Index decomposition analysis with multidimensional and multilevel energy data [J].
Ang, B. W. ;
Wang, H. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 51 :67-76
[4]   A new energy decomposition method: perfect in decomposition and consistent in aggregation [J].
Ang, BW ;
Liu, FL .
ENERGY, 2001, 26 (06) :537-548
[5]  
Arora R.U., 2014, J. Develop. Area., V48, P383, DOI [10.1353/jda.2014.0038, DOI 10.1353/JDA.2014.0038]
[6]   Will China comply with its 2020 carbon intensity commitment? [J].
Cansino, Jose M. ;
Roman, Rocio ;
Rueda-Cantuche, Jose M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2015, 47 :108-117
[7]  
Carlsson F., 2001, GOTEBORG U WORKING P
[8]   China's 'New Normal': Is the growth slowdown demand- or supply-driven [J].
Chen, Anping ;
Groenewold, Nicolaas .
CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2019, 58
[9]   Driving factors of global carbon footprint pressure: Based on vegetation carbon sequestration [J].
Chen, Jiandong ;
Fan, Wei ;
Li, Ding ;
Liu, Xin ;
Song, Malin .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 267
[10]   Driving factors of CO2 emissions and inequality characteristics in China: A combined decomposition approach [J].
Chen, Jiandong ;
Xu, Chong ;
Cui, Lianbiao ;
Huang, Shuo ;
Song, Malin .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 78 :589-597