Complication Risk in Primary and Revision Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparable Alternative to Conventional Open Techniques?

被引:5
|
作者
Bortz, Cole [1 ]
Alas, Haddy [1 ]
Segreto, Frank [1 ]
Horn, Samantha R. [1 ]
Varlotta, Christopher [1 ]
Brown, Avery E. [1 ]
Pierce, Katherine E. [1 ]
Ge, David H. [1 ]
Vasquez-Montes, Dennis [1 ]
Lafage, Virginie [2 ]
Lafage, Renaud [2 ]
Fischer, Charla R. [1 ]
Gerling, Michael C. [1 ]
Protopsaltis, Themistocles S. [1 ]
Buckland, Aaron J. [1 ]
Sciubba, Daniel M. [3 ]
De La Garza-Ramos, Rafael [4 ]
Passias, Peter G. [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Langone Orthoped Hosp, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Hosp Special Surg, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Bronx Lebanon Hosp Ctr, New York, NY USA
关键词
minimally invasive surgical procedures; postoperative complications; lumbosacral region; retrospective studies; length of stay; operative time; patient readmission; comorbidity; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SPINE SURGERY; OUTCOMES; POSTERIOR; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1177/2192568219867289
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of prospective patients undergoing minimally invasive lumbar fusion at a single academic institution. Objective: To assess differences in perioperative outcomes between primary and revision MIS (minimally invasive surgical) lumbar interbody fusion patients and compare with those undergoing corresponding open procedures. Methods: Patients >= 18 years old undergoing lumbar interbody fusion were grouped by surgical technique: MIS or open. Patients within each group were propensity score matched for comorbidities and levels fused. Patient demographics, surgical factors, and perioperative complication incidences were compared between primary and revision cases using means comparison tests, as appropriate. Results: Of the 214 lumbar interbody fusion patients included after propensity score matching, 44 (21%) cases were MIS, and 170 (79%) were open. For MIS patients, there were no significant differences between primary and revision cases in estimated blood loss (EBL; 344 vs 299 cm(3), P = .682); however, primary cases had longer operative times (301 vs 246 minutes, P = .029). There were no differences in length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit LOS, readmission, and intraoperative or postoperative complications (all P > .05). For open patients, there were no differences between primary and revision cases in EBL (P > .05), although revisions had longer operative times (331 vs 278 minutes, P = .018) and more postoperative complications (61.7% vs 23.8%, P < .001). MIS revision procedures were shorter than open revisions (182 vs 213 minutes, P = .197) with significantly less EBL (294 vs 965 cm(3), P < .001), shorter inpatient and intensive care unit LOS, and fewer postoperative complications (all P < .05). Conclusions: Clinical outcomes of revision MIS lumbar interbody fusion were similar to those of primary surgery. Additionally, MIS techniques were associated with less EBL, shorter LOS, and fewer perioperative complications than corresponding open revisions.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 626
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Kulkarni, Arvind G.
    Bohra, Hussain
    Dhruv, Abhilash
    Sarraf, Abhishek
    Bassi, Anupreet
    Patil, Vishwanath M.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2016, 50 (05) : 464 - 472
  • [22] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Ahn, Junyoung
    Tabaraee, Ehsan
    Singh, Kern
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2015, 28 (06): : 222 - 225
  • [23] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical description and review of the literature
    Martin Vazan
    Jens Gempt
    Bernhard Meyer
    Niels Buchmann
    Yu- Mi Ryang
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2017, 159 : 1137 - 1146
  • [24] Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Clinical Adjacent Segment Pathology A Comparative Study With Conventional Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Park, Hyung-Youl
    Kim, Young-Hoon
    Ha, Kee-Yong
    Kim, Sang-Il
    Min, Hyung-Ki
    Oh, In-Soo
    Seo, Jun-Yeong
    Chang, Dong-Gune
    Park, Jong-Tae
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (10): : 2019 - E433
  • [25] Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in obese patients
    Lau, Darryl
    Khan, Adam
    Terman, Samuel W.
    Yee, Timothy
    La Marca, Frank
    Park, Paul
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2013, 35 (02)
  • [26] Minimally Invasive versus Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review
    Sidhu, Gursukhman S.
    Henkelman, Erik
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Albert, Todd J.
    Hilibrand, Alan
    Anderson, D. Greg
    Rihn, Jeffrey A.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 472 (06) : 1792 - 1799
  • [27] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Outpatient Setting
    Emami, Arash
    Faloon, Michael
    Issa, Kimona
    Shafa, Eiman
    Pourtaheri, Sina
    Sinha, Kumar
    Hwang, Ki S.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 39 (06) : E1218 - E1222
  • [28] Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence
    Tian, Nai-Feng
    Wu, Yao-Sen
    Zhang, Xiao-Lei
    Xu, Hua-Zi
    Chi, Yong-Long
    Mao, Fang-Min
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (08) : 1741 - 1749
  • [29] Outpatient Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody: Fusion Predictive Factors and Clinical Results
    Smith, William D.
    Wohns, Richard N. W.
    Christian, Ginger
    Rodgers, Evelyn J.
    Rodgers, W. Blake
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (08) : S106 - S122
  • [30] Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kou, Yuanqiao
    Chang, Jianjun
    Guan, Xiaoming
    Chang, Qiang
    Feng, Haoyu
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 152 : E352 - E368