Is there enough water? How bearish and bullish outlooks are linked to decision maker perspectives on environmental flows

被引:17
作者
Wineland, Sean M. [1 ]
Fovargue, Rachel [1 ]
York, Betsey [2 ]
Lynch, Abigail J. [3 ]
Paukert, Craig P. [4 ]
Neeson, Thomas M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Geog & Environm Sustainabil, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[2] Oklahoma Dept Wildlife Conservat, Oklahoma City, OK USA
[3] US Geol Survey, Natl Climate Adaptat Sci Ctr, 959 Natl Ctr, Reston, VA 22092 USA
[4] Univ Missouri, Sch Nat Resources, Missouri Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, US Geol Survey, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
Environmental flows; Freshwater biodiversity; Policy implementation; Decision making; Water management; Climate change; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ACQUIRING WATER; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; SCIENCE; REGIMES; FUTURE; IMPLEMENTATION; GOVERNANCE; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111694
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Policies that mandate environmental flows (e-flows) can be powerful tools for freshwater conservation, but implementation of these policies faces many hurdles. To better understand these challenges, we explored two key questions: (1) What additional data are needed to implement e-flows? and (2) What are the major socio-political barriers to implementing e-flows? We surveyed water and natural resource decision makers in the semi-arid Red River basin, Texas-Oklahoma, USA, and used social network analysis to analyze their communication patterns. Most respondents agreed that e-flows can provide important benefits and identified the same data needs. However, respondents sharply in their beliefs on other issues, and a clustering analysis revealed two distinct groups of decision makers. One cluster of decision makers tended to be bearish, or pessimistic, and believed that: current flow conditions are not adequate, there are many serious socio-political barriers to implementation, water conflicts will likely increase in the future, and climate change is likely to exacerbate these issues. The other cluster of respondents was bullish, or optimistic: they foresaw fewer future water conflicts and fewer sociopolitical barriers to implementation. Despite these differences, both clusters largely identified the same data needs and barriers to e-flows implementation. Our social network analysis revealed that the frequency of communication between clusters was not significantly different than the frequency of communication within clusters. Overall, our results suggest that the different perspectives of decision-makers could complicate efforts to implement e-flows and proactively plan for climate change. However, there are opportunities for collaboration on addressing common data needs and barriers to implementation. Overall, our study provides a key socioenvironmental perspective on e-flows implementation from a semi-arid and socio-politically complex river basin and contextualizes the many challenges facing e-flows implementation in river basins globally.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 105 条
  • [1] Understanding rivers and their social relations: A critical step to advance environmental water management
    Anderson, Elizabeth P.
    Jackson, Sue
    Tharme, Rebecca E.
    Douglas, Michael
    Flotemersch, Joseph E.
    Zwarteveen, Margreet
    Lokgariwar, Chicu
    Montoya, Mariana
    Wali, Alaka
    Tipa, Gail T.
    Jardine, Timothy D.
    Olden, Julian D.
    Cheng, Lin
    Conallin, John
    Cosens, Barbara
    Dickens, Chris
    Garrick, Dustin
    Groenfeldt, David
    Kabogo, Jane
    Roux, Dirk J.
    Ruhi, Albert
    Arthington, Angela H.
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-WATER, 2019, 6 (06):
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-Making
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2004, THEORIES SMALL GROUP
  • [4] The Brisbane Declaration and Global Action Agenda on Environmental Flows (2018)
    Arthington, Angela H.
    Bhaduri, Anik
    Bunn, Stuart E.
    Jackson, Sue E.
    Tharme, Rebecca E.
    Tickner, Dave
    Young, Bill
    Acreman, Mike
    Baker, Natalie
    Capon, Samantha
    Horne, Avril C.
    Kendy, Eloise
    McClain, Michael E.
    Poff, N. Leroy
    Richter, Brian D.
    Ward, Selina
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2018, 6
  • [5] Recent advances in environmental flows science and water management-Innovation in the Anthropocene
    Arthington, Angela H.
    Kennen, Jonathan G.
    Stein, Eric D.
    Webb, J. Angus
    [J]. FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (08) : 1022 - 1034
  • [6] Social-ecological alignment and ecological conditions in coral reefs
    Barnes, Michele L.
    Bodin, Orjan
    McClanahan, Tim R.
    Kittinger, John N.
    Hoey, Andrew S.
    Gaoue, Orou G.
    Graham, Nicholas A. J.
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)
  • [7] Social networks and environmental outcomes
    Barnes, Michele L.
    Lynham, John
    Kalberg, Kolter
    Leung, PingSun
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (23) : 6466 - 6471
  • [8] The Influence of Ethnic Diversity on Social Network Structure in a Common-Pool Resource System: Implications for Collaborative Management
    Barnes-Mauthe, Michele
    Arita, Shawn
    Allen, Stewart D.
    Gray, Steven A.
    Leung, PingSun
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (01):
  • [9] Utility engagement with payments for watershed services in the United States
    Bennett, Drew E.
    Gosnell, Hannah
    Lurie, Susan
    Duncan, Sally
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 8 : 56 - 64
  • [10] Benson R. D., 2007, J LAND, V27, P1