Performance on the Nephrology In-Training Examination and ABIM Nephrology Certification Examination Outcomes

被引:12
|
作者
Jurich, Daniel [1 ]
Duhigg, Lauren M. [2 ]
Plumb, Troy J. [3 ]
Haist, Steven A. [1 ]
Hawley, Janine L. [1 ]
Lipner, Rebecca S. [2 ]
Smith, Laurel [1 ]
Norby, Suzanne M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Board Med Examiners, Dept Profess Serv, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Amer Board Internal Med, Assessment & Res Div, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Div Nephrol, Omaha, NE USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Internal Med, Div Nephrol & Hypertens, Rochester, MN USA
来源
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY | 2018年 / 13卷 / 05期
关键词
In-Training Examination; Board Certification Examination; Fellowship Programs; American Board of Internal Medicine; Fellowships and Scholarships; nephrology; Schools; Medical; Confidence Intervals; Certification; Feedback; Regression Analysis; Cohort Studies; AMERICAN-BOARD; PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY;
D O I
10.2215/CJN.05580517
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and objectives Medical specialty and subspecialty fellowship programs administer subject-specific in-training examinations to provide feedback about level of medical knowledge to fellows preparing for subsequent board certification. This study evaluated the association between the American Society of Nephrology In-Training Examination and the American Board of Internal Medicine Nephrology Certification Examination in terms of scores and passing status. Design, setting, participants, & measurements The study included 1684 nephrology fellows who completed the American Society of Nephrology In-Training Examination in their second year of fellowship training between 2009 and 2014. Regression analysis examined the association between In-Training Examination and first-time Nephrology Certification Examination scores as well as passing status relative to other standardized assessments. Results This cohort included primarily men (62%) and international medical school graduates (62%), and fellows had an average age of 32 years old at the time of first completing the Nephrology Certification Examination. An overwhelming majority (89%) passed the Nephrology Certification on their first attempt. In-Training Examination scores showed the strongest association with first-time Nephrology Certification Examination scores, accounting for approximately 50% of the total explained variance in the model. Each SD increase in In-Training Examination scores was associated with a difference of 30 U (95% confidence interval, 27 to 33) in certification performance. In-Training Examination scores also were significantly associated with passing status on the Nephrology Certification Examination on the first attempt (odds ratio, 3.46 per SD difference in the In-Training Examination; 95% confidence interval, 2.68 to 4.54). An In-Training Examination threshold of 375, approximately 1 SD below the mean, yielded a positive predictive value of 0.92 and a negative predictive value of 0.50. Conclusions American Society of Nephrology In-Training Examination performance is significantly associated with American Board of Internal Medicine Nephrology Certification Examination score and passing status.
引用
收藏
页码:710 / 717
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Medical Knowledge Assessment by Hematology and Medical Oncology In-Training Examinations Are Better Than Program Director Assessments at Predicting Subspecialty Certification Examination Performance
    Collichio, Frances A.
    Hess, Brian J.
    Muchmore, Elaine A.
    Duhigg, Lauren
    Lipner, Rebecca S.
    Haist, Steven
    Hawley, Janine L.
    Morrison, Carol A.
    Clayton, Charles P.
    Raymond, Marilyn J.
    Kayoumi, Karen M.
    Gitlin, Scott D.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2017, 32 (03) : 647 - 654
  • [22] Analysis of the Trauma Section of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination
    Taylor, Benjamin C.
    Fowler, T. Ty
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 34 (07) : E261 - E266
  • [23] The Predictive Validity of the ABFM's In-Training Examination
    O'Neill, Thomas R.
    Li, Zijia
    Peabody, Michael R.
    Lybarger, Melanie
    Royal, Kenneth
    Puffer, James C.
    FAMILY MEDICINE, 2015, 47 (05) : 349 - 356
  • [24] A Commentary on the Use of the Internal Medicine In-Training Examination
    Wang, Helen
    Nugent, Rebecca
    Nugent, Connie
    Nugent, Kenneth
    Phy, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 122 (09): : 879 - 883
  • [25] Predictive Value of the Korean Academy of Family Medicine In-Training Examination for Certifying Examination
    Cho, Jung-Jin
    Kim, Ji-Yong
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2011, 32 (06): : 352 - 357
  • [26] The Impact of the Hospital Volume on the Performance of Residents on the General Medicine In-Training Examination: A Multicenter Study in Japan
    Mizuno, Atsushi
    Tsugawa, Yusuke
    Shimizu, Taro
    Nishizaki, Yuji
    Okubo, Tomoya
    Tanoue, Yusuke
    Konishi, Ryota
    Shiojiri, Toshiaki
    Tokuda, Yasuharu
    INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 55 (12) : 1553 - 1558
  • [27] Pulmonary and Critical Care In-Service Training Examination Score as a Predictor of Board Certification Examination Performance
    Kempainen, Robert R.
    Hess, Brian J.
    Addrizzo-Harris, Doreen J.
    Schaad, Douglas C.
    Scott, Craig S.
    Carlin, Brian W.
    Shaw, Robert C., Jr.
    Duhigg, Lauren
    Lipner, Rebecca S.
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2016, 13 (04) : 481 - 488
  • [28] The Changing Nature of the Oncology Section of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination
    Schultz, Emily M.
    Frisby, Justin C.
    Miskiel, Sandra A.
    Patel, Deep K.
    Mulcahey, Mary K.
    Kim, Tae Won B.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2020, 28 (12) : E532 - E539
  • [29] Board review course effect on resident in-training examination
    Cheng, David
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 1 : 327 - 329
  • [30] Board review course effect on resident in-training examination
    David Cheng
    International Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2008, 1 (4) : 327 - 329