A comparison between Ensemble and MaxEnt species distribution modelling approaches for conservation: A case study with Egyptian medicinal plants

被引:310
作者
Kaky, Emad [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Nolan, Victoria [1 ]
Alatawi, Abdulaziz [1 ,4 ]
Gilbert, Francis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Life Sci, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Sulaimani Polytech Univ, Res Ctr, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq
[3] Sulaimani Polytech Univ, Kalar Tech Inst, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq
[4] Univ Tabuk, Dept Biol, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Species distribution modelling; Conservation planning; Habitat suitability; Egypt; Medicinal plants; CLIMATE-CHANGE; HABITAT SUITABILITY; SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION; POTENTIAL DISTRIBUTION; ENVELOPE MODELS; BROAD-SCALE; ACCURACY; FUTURE; PREDICTIONS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoinf.2020.101150
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Understanding the relationship between the geographical distribution of taxa and their environmental conditions is a key concept in ecology and conservation. The use of ensemble modelling methods for species distribution modelling (SDM) have been promoted over single algorithms such as Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt). Nevertheless, we suggest that in cases where data, technical support or computational power are limited, for example in developing countries, single algorithm methods produce robust and accurate distribution maps. We fit SDMs for 114 Egyptian medicinal plant species (nearly all native) with a total of 14,396 occurrence points. The predictive performances of eight single-algorithm methods (maxent, random forest (rf), support-vector machine (svm), maxlike, boosted regression trees (brt), classification and regression trees (cart), flexible discriminant analysis (fda) and generalised linear models (glm)) were compared to an ensemble modelling approach combining all eight algorithms. Predictions were based originally on the current climate, and then projected into the future time slice of 2050 based on four alternate climate change scenarios (A2a and B2a for CMIP3 and RCP 2.6 and RCP 8.5 for CMIP5). Ensemble modelling, MaxEnt and rf achieved the highest predictive performances based on AUC and TSS, while svm and cart had the poorest performance. There is high similarity in habitat suitability between MaxEnt and ensemble predictive maps for both current and future emission scenarios, but lower similarity between rf and ensemble, or rf and MaxEnt. We conclude that single-algorithm modelling methods, particularly MaxEnt, are capable of producing distribution maps of comparable accuracy to ensemble methods. Furthermore, the ease of use, reduced computational time and simplicity of methods like MaxEnt provides support for their use in scenarios when the choice of modelling methods, knowledge or computational power is limited but the need for robust and accurate conservation predictions is urgent.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 118 条
[1]   Using MaxEnt modeling to predict the potential distribution of the endemic plant Rosa arabica Crep. in Egypt [J].
Abdelaal, Mohamed ;
Fois, Mauro ;
Fenu, Giuseppe ;
Bacchetta, Gianluigi .
ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2019, 50 :68-75
[2]   Modelling terrestrial reptile species richness, distributions and habitat suitability in Saudi Arabia [J].
Alatawi, Abdulaziz S. ;
Gilbert, Francis ;
Reader, Tom .
JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS, 2020, 178
[3]   Predicting the future of species diversity: macroecological theory, climate change, and direct tests of alternative forecasting methods [J].
Algar, Adam C. ;
Kharouba, Heather M. ;
Young, Eric R. ;
Kerr, Jeremy T. .
ECOGRAPHY, 2009, 32 (01) :22-33
[4]   Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS) [J].
Allouche, Omri ;
Tsoar, Asaf ;
Kadmon, Ronen .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2006, 43 (06) :1223-1232
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Introduction to Artificial Neural Systems
[6]   Reducing uncertainty in projections of extinction risk from climate change [J].
Araújo, MB ;
Whittaker, RJ ;
Ladle, RJ ;
Erhard, M .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2005, 14 (06) :529-538
[7]   Ensemble forecasting of species distributions [J].
Araujo, Miguel B. ;
New, Mark .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2007, 22 (01) :42-47
[8]   Improving species distribution models for climate change studies: variable selection and scale [J].
Austin, Mike P. ;
Van Niel, Kimberly P. .
JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2011, 38 (01) :1-8
[9]  
Baha-El-Din S., 2006, GUIDE REPTILES AMPHI
[10]   Use of Maximum Entropy Modeling in Wildlife Research [J].
Baldwin, Roger A. .
ENTROPY, 2009, 11 (04) :854-866