A REVIEW OF PRACTICES AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR ODOR CONTROL IN SWINE PRODUCTION FACILITIES

被引:2
作者
Liu, Z. [1 ]
Powers, W. [2 ]
Mukhtar, S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, College Stn, TX USA
关键词
Ammonia; Biofilter; Cover; Diet; Manure; Emission; Hydrogen sulfide; Mitigation; Odor; DIETARY CRUDE PROTEIN; HYDROGEN-SULFIDE EMISSIONS; ANIMAL PRODUCTION SITES; PIGGERY EFFLUENT PONDS; FREE SETBACK DISTANCES; MANURE STORAGE COVERS; AMMONIA EMISSION; NITROGEN-EXCRETION; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; LIVESTOCK WASTES;
D O I
10.13031/aea.30.10493
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The objective of this article is to provide a systematic review on practices and technologies for odor control in swine production facilities and to summarize available data on odor reduction effectiveness of promising technologies, as well as provide information on key parameters and associated costs. Odors from swine facilities comprise hundreds of chemicals, including volatile organic compounds (VOC), ammonia (NH3), and hydrogen sulfide (H2S). The medians of emission rates from swine houses in literature are 5 OU/s/pig for odor, and 0.4, 2.8, and 0.1 kg/yr/pig for VOC, NH3, and H2S respectively. The medians of emission rates from swine manure storage facilities in literature are 5 OU/s/m(2) for odor, and 1.4, 2.1, and 0.2 kg/yr/pig for VOC, NH3, and H2S, respectively. Facility maintenance and management practices to reduce impact of odor are reviewed in regard to regular cleaning of facilities, ventilation, floor design, drainage and manure removal systems, frequent manure removal, manure storage, and odor separation distances. Approaches to control odor and air pollution can be classified into three categories: ration/diet modification, manure treatment, capture/treatment of emitted gases and enhanced dispersion. Each of these mitigation approaches includes several specific technologies, which are summarized in tables with an evaluation of overall cost and brief comments on advantages or limitations of each technology. Diet modification strategies have been shown to reduce NH3 emissions effectively with low cost and should be considered as a best management practices, although their effectiveness in reducing odor is still uncertain. Permeable covers and biofilters seem to have great potential to be the most promising and cost effective technologies for manure storage facilities and swine houses respectively. However, both of the technologies need careful maintenance to perform effectively. Care must be taken to select technologies that are compatible with the management capabilities of the operation to prevent potential failure due to mismanagement.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 492
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Energy and Chemicals Production from Coal-based Technologies: A Review [J].
Rashid, Muhammad Imran ;
Isah, Umar Abdullahi ;
Athar, Muhammad ;
Benhelal, Emad .
CHEMBIOENG REVIEWS, 2023, 10 (05) :841-851
[42]   A short review of bioaerosol emissions from gas bioreactors: Health threats, influencing factors and control technologies [J].
Hu, Xu-Rui ;
Han, Meng-Fei ;
Wang, Can ;
Yang, Nan-Yang ;
Wang, Yong-Chao ;
Duan, Er-Hong ;
Hsi, Hsing-Cheng ;
Deng, Ji-Guang .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2020, 253
[43]   A REVIEW OF CONSTRUCTION SITE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR EROSION CONTROL [J].
Tyner, J. S. ;
Yoder, D. C. ;
Chomicki, B. J. ;
Tyagi, A. .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2011, 54 (02) :441-450
[44]   Occurrence of fungal spores in drinking water: A review of pathogenicity, odor, chlorine resistance and control strategies [J].
Zhao, Heng-Xuan ;
Zhang, Tian -Yang ;
Wang, Hong ;
Hu, Chen-Yan ;
Tang, Yu-Lin ;
Xu, Bin .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 853
[45]   Pretreatment technologies for industrial effluents: Critical review on bioenergy production and environmental concerns [J].
Prabakar, Desika ;
Suvetha, Subha K. ;
Manimudi, Varshini T. ;
Mathimani, Thangavel ;
Kumar, Gopalakrishnan ;
Rene, Eldon R. ;
Pugazhendhi, Arivalagan .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 218 :165-180
[46]   Literature review of air pollution control biofilters and biotrickling filters for odor and volatile organic compound removal [J].
Iranpour, R ;
Coxa, HHJ ;
Deshusses, MA ;
Schroeder, ED .
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS, 2005, 24 (03) :254-267
[47]   Review on the contribution of farming practices and technologies towards climate-smart agricultural outcomes in a European context [J].
Erekalo, Kassa Tarekegn ;
Pedersen, Soren Marcus ;
Christensen, Tove ;
Denver, Sigrid ;
Gemtou, Marilena ;
Fountas, Spyros ;
Isakhanyan, Gohar .
SMART AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 7
[48]   Emerging technologies for biogas production: A critical review on recent progress, challenges and future perspectives [J].
Sher, Farooq ;
Smjecanin, Narcisa ;
Hrnjic, Harun ;
Karadz, Amar ;
Omanovic, Rasim ;
Sehovic, Elma ;
Sulejmanovic, Jasmina .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2024, 188 :834-859
[49]   Critical review on processing technologies and economic aspect of bio-coal briquette production [J].
Rawat, Shweta ;
Kumar, Sanjay .
PREPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 52 (08) :855-871
[50]   The potential of cassava biomass and applicable technologies for sustainable biogas production in South Africa: A review [J].
Okudoh, Vincent ;
Trois, Cristina ;
Workneh, Tilahun ;
Schmidt, Stefan .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 39 :1035-1052