A REVIEW OF PRACTICES AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR ODOR CONTROL IN SWINE PRODUCTION FACILITIES

被引:2
作者
Liu, Z. [1 ]
Powers, W. [2 ]
Mukhtar, S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, College Stn, TX USA
关键词
Ammonia; Biofilter; Cover; Diet; Manure; Emission; Hydrogen sulfide; Mitigation; Odor; DIETARY CRUDE PROTEIN; HYDROGEN-SULFIDE EMISSIONS; ANIMAL PRODUCTION SITES; PIGGERY EFFLUENT PONDS; FREE SETBACK DISTANCES; MANURE STORAGE COVERS; AMMONIA EMISSION; NITROGEN-EXCRETION; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; LIVESTOCK WASTES;
D O I
10.13031/aea.30.10493
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The objective of this article is to provide a systematic review on practices and technologies for odor control in swine production facilities and to summarize available data on odor reduction effectiveness of promising technologies, as well as provide information on key parameters and associated costs. Odors from swine facilities comprise hundreds of chemicals, including volatile organic compounds (VOC), ammonia (NH3), and hydrogen sulfide (H2S). The medians of emission rates from swine houses in literature are 5 OU/s/pig for odor, and 0.4, 2.8, and 0.1 kg/yr/pig for VOC, NH3, and H2S respectively. The medians of emission rates from swine manure storage facilities in literature are 5 OU/s/m(2) for odor, and 1.4, 2.1, and 0.2 kg/yr/pig for VOC, NH3, and H2S, respectively. Facility maintenance and management practices to reduce impact of odor are reviewed in regard to regular cleaning of facilities, ventilation, floor design, drainage and manure removal systems, frequent manure removal, manure storage, and odor separation distances. Approaches to control odor and air pollution can be classified into three categories: ration/diet modification, manure treatment, capture/treatment of emitted gases and enhanced dispersion. Each of these mitigation approaches includes several specific technologies, which are summarized in tables with an evaluation of overall cost and brief comments on advantages or limitations of each technology. Diet modification strategies have been shown to reduce NH3 emissions effectively with low cost and should be considered as a best management practices, although their effectiveness in reducing odor is still uncertain. Permeable covers and biofilters seem to have great potential to be the most promising and cost effective technologies for manure storage facilities and swine houses respectively. However, both of the technologies need careful maintenance to perform effectively. Care must be taken to select technologies that are compatible with the management capabilities of the operation to prevent potential failure due to mismanagement.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 492
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   MODELING RECEPTOR ODOR EXPOSURE FROM SWINE PRODUCTION SOURCES USING CAM [J].
Hoff, S. J. ;
Bundy, D. S. ;
Harmon, J. D. .
APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE, 2008, 24 (06) :821-837
[22]   Strategies to control odours in livestock facilities: a critical review [J].
Ubeda, Y. ;
Lopez-Jimenez, P. A. ;
Nicolas, J. ;
Calvet, S. .
SPANISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2013, 11 (04) :1004-1015
[23]   Soybean meal inclusion rate effects on odor, hydrogen sulfide and ammonia in commercial swine production units. [J].
Stender, D. R. ;
Powers, W. ;
Johnson, C. ;
Harmon, J. ;
Kohl, K. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2007, 85 :115-115
[24]   A surface aeration system to control manure odor from open storage facilities [J].
Zhang, ZJ ;
Zhu, J .
ANIMAL, AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD PROCESSING WASTES IX, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, :144-152
[25]   Implications of ammonia production and emissions from commercial poultry facilities: A review [J].
Ritz, CW ;
Fairchild, BD ;
Lacy, MP .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED POULTRY RESEARCH, 2004, 13 (04) :684-692
[26]   ACOUSTIC ENVIRONMENT AND GAS PRODUCTION IN DIFFERENT GROWING-FINISHING SWINE FACILITIES [J].
Andrade, Rafaella R. ;
Campos, Alessandro T. ;
Cecchin, Daiane ;
Sousa, Francine A. ;
Amaral, Pedro I. S. .
ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA, 2016, 36 (06) :953-961
[27]   Slaughterhouse Wastes: a Review on Regulations and Current Technologies for Biogas Production [J].
Carlini, Maurizio ;
Castellucci, Sonia ;
Cocchi, Silvia ;
Allegrini, Elena .
SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND ENERGY ENGINEERING, 2014, 827 :91-+
[28]   A review of technologies for in-situ sulfide control in anaerobic digestion [J].
Jung, Heejung ;
Kim, Danbee ;
Choi, Hyungmin ;
Lee, Changsoo .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 157
[29]   A review on biomass based hydrogen production technologies [J].
Pal, Dan Bahadur ;
Singh, Arvind ;
Bhatnagar, Ashish .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2022, 47 (03) :1461-1480
[30]   Review of electrochemical ammonia production technologies and materials [J].
Giddey, S. ;
Badwal, S. P. S. ;
Kulkarni, A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2013, 38 (34) :14576-14594