Comparison of the Icare Tonometer and the Hand-held Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Pediatric Aphakia

被引:11
|
作者
Li, Yunping [1 ]
Tang, Luosheng [1 ]
Xiao, Manyi [1 ]
Jia, Songbai [1 ]
Liu, Ping [1 ]
Zhou, Yi [1 ]
Chen, Huihui [1 ]
Zeng, Jiexi [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent S Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Ophthalmol, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
tonometer; chlorate hydrate; pediatric aphakia; Perkins; MEASURING INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; OCULAR-RESPONSE-ANALYZER; REBOUND TONOMETER; CLINICAL-EVALUATION; GLAUCOMA; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1097/IJG.0b013e31825afc87
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: Purpose: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained by the Icare and the hand-held Goldmann applanation tonometer (also called Perkins) in aphakic children after congenital cataract surgery. Methods: Methods: We investigated 125 children with aphakia after congenital cataract surgery in this study. A younger group (3 to 30 mo) and an elder group (31 to 72 mo) were divided in those patients by their age. In the younger group, all measurements were performed under sedation using chloral hydrate. Axial length of the eye and central corneal thickness (CCT) were also measured from all patients. Results: Results: Significant correlation was found on IOP readings obtained by the Icare and the Perkins tonometers (r=0.943, P < 0.001). After establishing a Bland-Altman plot, we found that 95% limit of the agreement between the 2 methods distributed between -1.6 to 5.6 mm Hg. The IOPs recorded from the Icare increased faster than that from the Perkins tonometer with the increase of the CCT thickness; a significant association relationship was found on the IOP difference between the 2 measurements (r=0.408, P < 0.001). However, no statistical correlation was identified between the axial length and the IOPs recorded by either tonometer. Conclusions: Conclusions: Most of the young patients accepted the Icare tonometer under unsedated conditions. This significant advantage indicated that the Icare tonometer will be overall better tolerated in pediatric aphakia population, although it could overestimate the IOPs compared with the measurements obtained from the Perkins tonometer. Differences in readings between the 2 tonometers become bigger as the CCT increase.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 554
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of ICare Rebound Tonometer With Noncontact Tonometer in Healthy Children
    Kageyama, Mitsuyo
    Hirooka, Kazuyuki
    Baba, Tetsuya
    Shiraga, Fumio
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2011, 20 (01) : 63 - 66
  • [32] Comparison of the Intraocular Pressure Measured Using the New Rebound Tonometer Icare ic100 and Icare TA01i or Goldmann Applanation Tonometer
    Nakakura, Shunsuke
    Mori, Etsuko
    Fujio, Yuki
    Fujisawa, Yasuko
    Matsuya, Kanae
    Kobayashi, Yui
    Tabuchi, Hitoshi
    Asaoka, Ryo
    Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2019, 28 (02) : 172 - 177
  • [33] Clinical Evaluation of the New Rebound Tonometers Icare PRO and Icare ONE Compared With the Goldmann Tonometer
    Moreno-Montanes, Javier
    Martinez-de-la-Casa, Jose M.
    Sabater, Alfonso L.
    Morales-Fernandez, Laura
    Saenz, Cristina
    Garcia-Feijoo, Julian
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2015, 24 (07) : 527 - 532
  • [34] Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty
    Salvetat, M. L.
    Zeppieri, M.
    Miani, F.
    Tosoni, C.
    Parisi, L.
    Brusini, P.
    EYE, 2011, 25 (05) : 642 - 650
  • [35] A New Tonometer-The Corvis ST Tonometer: Clinical Comparison with Noncontact and Goldmann Applanation Tonometers
    Hong, Jiaxu
    Xu, Jianjiang
    Wei, Anji
    Deng, Sophie X.
    Cui, Xinhan
    Yu, Xiaobo
    Sun, Xinghuai
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (01) : 659 - 665
  • [36] Agreement among Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare, and Icare PRO rebound tonometers; non-contact tonometer; and Tonopen XL in healthy elderly subjects
    Kato, Yoshitake
    Nakakura, Shunsuke
    Matsuo, Naoko
    Yoshitomi, Kayo
    Handa, Marina
    Tabuchi, Hitoshi
    Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 38 (02) : 687 - 696
  • [37] Agreement among Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare, and Icare PRO rebound tonometers; non-contact tonometer; and Tonopen XL in healthy elderly subjects
    Yoshitake Kato
    Shunsuke Nakakura
    Naoko Matsuo
    Kayo Yoshitomi
    Marina Handa
    Hitoshi Tabuchi
    Yoshiaki Kiuchi
    International Ophthalmology, 2018, 38 : 687 - 696
  • [38] Comparison of intraocular pressure obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometer, Corvis ST and an airpuff tonometer in healthy adults
    Karmiris, Efthymios
    Tsiripidis, Konstantinos
    Gartaganis, Panos S.
    Totou, Styliani
    Vasilopoulou, Maria-Giannoula
    Patelis, Andreas
    Giannakis, Ioannis
    Chalkiadaki, Evangelia
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 32 (02) : 951 - 959
  • [39] Comparison of the IOPen® and iCare® rebound tonometers with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population
    Jorge, J.
    Fernandes, P.
    Queiros, A.
    Ribeiro, P.
    Garces, C.
    Gonzalez-Meijome, J. M.
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2010, 30 (01) : 108 - 112
  • [40] A comparison of intraocular pressure values obtained using a Goldmann applanation tonometer and a handheld version of applanation resonance tonometer: A preliminary report
    Mulak, Malgorzata
    Czak, Wojciech A.
    Mimier, Malgorzata
    Kaczmarek, Radoslaw
    ADVANCES IN CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 27 (04): : 481 - 485