Comparison of the Icare Tonometer and the Hand-held Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Pediatric Aphakia

被引:11
|
作者
Li, Yunping [1 ]
Tang, Luosheng [1 ]
Xiao, Manyi [1 ]
Jia, Songbai [1 ]
Liu, Ping [1 ]
Zhou, Yi [1 ]
Chen, Huihui [1 ]
Zeng, Jiexi [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent S Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Ophthalmol, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
tonometer; chlorate hydrate; pediatric aphakia; Perkins; MEASURING INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; OCULAR-RESPONSE-ANALYZER; REBOUND TONOMETER; CLINICAL-EVALUATION; GLAUCOMA; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1097/IJG.0b013e31825afc87
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: Purpose: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained by the Icare and the hand-held Goldmann applanation tonometer (also called Perkins) in aphakic children after congenital cataract surgery. Methods: Methods: We investigated 125 children with aphakia after congenital cataract surgery in this study. A younger group (3 to 30 mo) and an elder group (31 to 72 mo) were divided in those patients by their age. In the younger group, all measurements were performed under sedation using chloral hydrate. Axial length of the eye and central corneal thickness (CCT) were also measured from all patients. Results: Results: Significant correlation was found on IOP readings obtained by the Icare and the Perkins tonometers (r=0.943, P < 0.001). After establishing a Bland-Altman plot, we found that 95% limit of the agreement between the 2 methods distributed between -1.6 to 5.6 mm Hg. The IOPs recorded from the Icare increased faster than that from the Perkins tonometer with the increase of the CCT thickness; a significant association relationship was found on the IOP difference between the 2 measurements (r=0.408, P < 0.001). However, no statistical correlation was identified between the axial length and the IOPs recorded by either tonometer. Conclusions: Conclusions: Most of the young patients accepted the Icare tonometer under unsedated conditions. This significant advantage indicated that the Icare tonometer will be overall better tolerated in pediatric aphakia population, although it could overestimate the IOPs compared with the measurements obtained from the Perkins tonometer. Differences in readings between the 2 tonometers become bigger as the CCT increase.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 554
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of rebound tonometer iCare IC200 as compared with IcarePRO and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma
    Nakakura, Shunsuke
    Asaoka, Ryo
    Terao, Etsuko
    Nagata, Yuki
    Fukuma, Yasuko
    Oogi, Satomi
    Shiraishi, Miku
    Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
    EYE AND VISION, 2021, 8 (01)
  • [22] Intradevice and Interdevice Agreement Between a Rebound Tonometer, Icare PRO, and the Tonopen XL and Kowa Hand-held Applanation Tonometer When Used in the Sitting and Supine Position
    Nakakura, Shunsuke
    Mori, Etsuko
    Yamamoto, Minami
    Tsushima, Yuuri
    Tabuchi, Hitoshi
    Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2015, 24 (07) : 515 - 521
  • [23] Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting
    Kim, Kyoung Nam
    Jeoung, Jin Wook
    Park, Ki Ho
    Yang, Min Kyu
    Kim, Dong Myung
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2013, 91 (05) : E392 - E396
  • [24] Comparison of the rebound tonometer (ICare®) to the applanation tonometer (Tonopen XL®) in normotensive dogs
    Leiva, M
    Naranjo, C
    Peña, MT
    VETERINARY OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 9 (01) : 17 - 21
  • [25] Comparison of Icare Rebound Tonometer and Perkins Applanation Tonometer in Community Eye Screening
    Ting, Siew Leng
    Lim, Lik Thai
    Ooi, Chor Yau
    Rahman, Md Mizanur
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 8 (03): : 229 - 232
  • [26] Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare® Home rebound tonometer (model TA022) and comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients
    Valero, B.
    Fenolland, J. -R.
    Rosenberg, R.
    Sendon, D.
    Mesnard, C.
    Sigaux, M.
    Giraud, J. -M.
    Renard, J. -P.
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2017, 40 (10): : 865 - 875
  • [27] Vergleich des iCare-Tonometers mit dem Goldmann-Tonometer in MalawiComparison of the iCare tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in Malawi
    J. Hohmann
    M. Schulze-Schwering
    T. Chirambo Nyaka
    V. Moyo
    P.C. Kayange
    D. Doycheva
    N.H. Batumba
    M.S. Spitzer
    Der Ophthalmologe, 2012, 109 : 1098 - 1102
  • [28] Comparison of ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer
    Renier C.
    Zeyen T.
    Fieuws S.
    Vandenbroeck S.
    Stalmans I.
    International Ophthalmology, 2010, 30 (6) : 651 - 659
  • [29] Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Icare PRO Rebound Tonometer, Tomey FT-1000 Noncontact Tonometer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Healthy Subjects
    Guler, Mete
    Bilak, Semsettin
    Bilgin, Burak
    Simsek, Ali
    Capkin, Musa
    Reyhan, Ali Hakim
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2015, 24 (08) : 613 - 618
  • [30] Comparability of Icare Pro Rebound Tonometer with Goldmann Applanation and Noncontact Tonometer in a Wide Range of Intraocular Pressure and Central Corneal Thickness
    Tamcelik, Nevbahar
    Atalay, Eray
    Cicik, Erdogan
    Ozkok, Ahmet
    OPHTHALMIC RESEARCH, 2015, 54 (01) : 18 - 25