Twice-daily 0.2% brimonidine 0.5% timolol fixed-combination therapy vs monotherapy with timolol or brimonidine in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension -: A 12-month randomized trial

被引:89
作者
Sherwood, Mark B.
Craven, E. Randy
Chou, Connie
DuBiner, Harvey B.
Batoosingh, Amy L.
Schiffman, Rhett M.
Whitcup, Scott M.
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] Glaucoma Consultants Colorado, Littleton, CO USA
[3] Allergan Pharmaceut Inc, Irvine, CA 92715 USA
[4] Clayton Eye Ctr, Morrow, GA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archopht.124.9.1230
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering efficacy and safety of a fixed combination of 0.2% brimonidine tartrate and 0.5% timolol maleate (fixed brimonidine-timolol) compared with the component medications. Methods: In 2 identical, 12-month, randomized, double-masked multicenter trials, patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma were treated with fixed brimonidine-timolol twice daily (n = 385), 0.2% brimonidine tartrate 3 times daily (n = 382), or 0.5% timolol maleate twice daily (n = 392). Main Outcomes Measures: Mean change from baseline IOP and incidence of adverse events. Results: The mean decrease from baseline IOP during 12-month follow-up was 4.4 to 7.6 mm Hg with fixed brimonidine-timolol, 2.7 to 5.5 mm Hg with brimonidine, and 3.9 to 6.2 mm Hg with timolol. Mean IOP reductions were significantly greater with fixed brimonidine-timolol compared with timolol at all measurements (P <= .002) and brimonidine at 8 AM, 10 AM, and 3 PM (P < .001) but not at 5 PM. The incidence of treatment related adverse events in the fixed-combination group was lower than that in the brimonidine group (P = .006) but higher than that in the timolol group (P < .001). The rate of discontinuation for adverse events was 14.3% with the fixed combination, 30.6% with brimonidine, and 5.1% with timolol. Conclusions: Twice-daily fixed brimonidine-timolol therapy provides sustained IOP lowering superior to monotherapy with either thrice-daily brimonidine or twice-daily timolol and is better tolerated than brimonidine but less well tolerated than timolol. Application to Clinical Practice: Fixed brimonidine-timolol is an effective and convenient IOP-lowering therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1230 / 1238
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
American Academy of Ophthalmology, 2000, PREF PRACT PATT PRIM
[2]   A short term study of the additive effect of timolol and brimonidine on intraocular pressure [J].
Arici, MK ;
Sayici, M ;
Toker, MI ;
Erdogan, H ;
Topalkara, A .
EYE, 2002, 16 (01) :39-43
[3]   A comparison of dorzolamide-timolol combination versus the concomitant drugs [J].
Choudhri, S ;
Wand, M ;
Shields, MB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 130 (06) :832-833
[4]   Timolol 0.5%/dorzolamide 2% fixed combination vs timolol maleate 0.5% and unoprostone 0.15% given twice daily to patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension [J].
Day, DG ;
Schacknow, PN ;
Wand, M ;
Sharpe, ED ;
Stewart, JA ;
Leech, J ;
Stewart, WC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 135 (02) :138-143
[5]   Pegaptanib for neovascular age-related macular degeneration [J].
Gragoudas, ES ;
Adamis, AP ;
Cunningham, ET ;
Feinsod, M ;
Guyer, DR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (27) :2805-2816
[6]   Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression - Results from the early manifest glaucoma trial [J].
Heijl, A ;
Leske, MC ;
Bengtsson, B ;
Hyman, L ;
Bengtsson, B ;
Hussein, M .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 120 (10) :1268-1279
[7]   Latanoprost and timolol combination therapy vs monotherapy - One-year randomized trial [J].
Higginbotham, EJ ;
Feldman, R ;
Stiles, M ;
Dubiner, H .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 120 (07) :915-922
[8]  
Kass MA, 2002, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V120, P701
[9]  
Larsson LI, 2001, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V119, P492
[10]   Effectiveness and safety of brimonidine as adjunctive therapy for patients with elevated intraocular pressure in a large, open-label community trial [J].
Lee, DA ;
Gornbein, JA .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2001, 10 (03) :220-226