Risk Factors and Maternal Morbidity Associated with Unintentional Hysterotomy Extension at the Time of Cesarean Delivery

被引:6
作者
Bligard, Katherine H. [1 ]
Durst, Jennifer K. [1 ,2 ]
Stout, Molly J. [1 ]
Martin, Shannon [1 ]
Cahill, Alison G. [1 ]
Macones, George A. [1 ]
Tuuli, Methodius G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 4911 Barnes Jewish Hosp Plaza,Campus Box 8064, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Ochsner Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New Orleans, LA USA
关键词
maternal morbidity; surgical complications; hysterotomy extension; cesarean delivery; IMPACTED FETAL HEAD; CERVICAL INSUFFICIENCY; EXTREME OBESITY; HEMORRHAGE; EXTRACTION; 2ND-STAGE; SECTION; LABOR;
D O I
10.1055/s-0038-1676112
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective Our aim was to estimate the incidence of unintentional hysterotomy extension at the time of cesarean delivery and to identify associated risk factors and maternal morbidity. Study Design We conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial evaluating chlorhexidine-alcohol versus iodine-alcohol for skin antisepsis in women undergoing cesarean delivery. We included patients with a low transverse hysterotomy. The primary outcome was the incidence of unintentional hysterotomy extension. Logistic regression was performed to identify independent factors associated with hysterotomy extension. Maternal morbidity was compared between patients with and without extension. Results Of 1,038 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 71 (6.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.4-8.5%) experienced a hysterotomy extension. Of several potential risk factors assessed, the second stage of labor was the only independent predictor of hysterotomy extension (adjusted odds ratio: 10.2; 95% CI: 2.6-39.8). Hysterotomy extension was associated with increased operative time (73 vs. 55.3 minutes; p < 0.01), need for blood transfusion (relative risk: 5; 95% CI: 1.6-15.2), and rate of additional surgical injury (RR: 17; 95% CI: 6.9-41.8). Conclusion Hysterotomy extensions are not infrequent at the time of cesarean delivery and are associated with increased maternal morbidity. Cesarean delivery during the second stage of labor is the main independent risk factor for hysterotomy extension.
引用
收藏
页码:1054 / 1059
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   A Simple Device Prevents Hysterotomy Extensions during Cesarean Delivery for Failed Second Stage of Labor [J].
Barrier, Breton F. ;
Allison, Jana L. ;
Andelin, Clark O. ;
Drobnis, Erma Z. .
GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2013, 76 (02) :90-94
[2]   Intraoperative surgical complication during cesarean section: an observational study of the incidence and risk factors [J].
Bergholt, T ;
Stenderup, JK ;
Vedsted-Jakobsen, A ;
Helm, P ;
Lenstrup, C .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 82 (03) :251-256
[3]   A meta-analysis of reverse breech extraction to deliver a deeply impacted head during cesarean delivery [J].
Berhan, Yifru ;
Berhan, Asres .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2014, 124 (02) :99-105
[4]   Blunt expansion of the low transverse uterine incision at cesarean delivery: a randomized comparison of 2 techniques [J].
Cromi, Antonella ;
Ghezzi, Fabio ;
Di Naro, Edoardo ;
Siesto, Gabriele ;
Loverro, Giuseppe ;
Bolis, Pierfrancesco .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (03) :292.e1-292.e6
[5]  
de la Torre Lesley, 2006, Am J Obstet Gynecol, V194, pe4, DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.026
[6]   Risk factors for post-operative wound infection in the setting of chorioamnionitis and cesarean delivery [J].
Dotters-Katz, Sarah K. ;
Feldman, Chelsea ;
Puechl, Allison ;
Grotegut, Chad A. ;
Heine, R. Phillips .
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (10) :1541-1545
[7]   Comparison of techniques used to deliver a deeply impacted fetal head at full dilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Jeve, Y. B. ;
Navti, O. B. ;
Konje, J. C. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 (03) :337-345
[8]   Cervical insufficiency following cesarean delivery after prolonged second stage of labor: Experiences of two cases [J].
Koyama, Shinsuke ;
Tomimatsu, Takuji ;
Kanagawa, Takeshi ;
Sawada, Kenjiro ;
Tsutsui, Tateki ;
Kimura, Tadashi .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2010, 36 (02) :411-413
[9]   Comparison of maternal outcomes from primary cesarean section during the second compared with first stage of labor by indication for the operation [J].
Lurie, Samuel ;
Raz, Nili ;
Boaz, Mona ;
Sadan, Oscar ;
Golan, Abraham .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2014, 182 :43-47
[10]   Intra-operative haemorrhage by blunt versus sharp expansion of the uterine incision at caesarean delivery: a randomised clinical trial [J].
Magann, EF ;
Chauhan, SP ;
Bufkin, L ;
Field, K ;
Roberts, WE ;
Martin, JN .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2002, 109 (04) :448-452