The ADDITION-Cambridge trial protocol: a cluster-randomised controlled trial of screening for type 2 diabetes and intensive treatment for screen-detected patients

被引:63
作者
Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B. [1 ]
Simmons, Rebecca K. [1 ]
Williams, Kate M. [2 ]
Barling, Roslyn S. [2 ]
Prevost, A. Toby [2 ]
Kinmonth, Ann Louise [2 ]
Wareham, Nicholas J. [1 ]
Griffin, Simon J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Addenbrookes Hosp, Epidemiol Unit, MRC, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Gen Practice & Primary Care Res Unit, Cambridge CB2 0SR, England
基金
英国惠康基金; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
MULTIFACTORIAL INTERVENTION; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; GLUCOSE CONTROL; RISK SCORE; PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT; FOLLOW-UP; INDIVIDUALS; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2458-9-136
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes poses a major public health challenge. Population-based screening and early treatment for type 2 diabetes could reduce this growing burden. However, the benefits of such a strategy remain uncertain. Methods and design: The ADDITION-Cambridge study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of (i) a stepwise screening strategy for type 2 diabetes; and (ii) intensive multifactorial treatment for people with screen-detected diabetes in primary care. 63 practices in the East Anglia region participated. Three undertook the pilot study, 33 were allocated to three groups: no screening (control), screening followed by intensive treatment (IT) and screening plus routine care (RC) in an unbalanced (1:3:3) randomisation. The remaining 27 practices were randomly allocated to IT and RC. A risk score incorporating routine practice data was used to identify people aged 40-69 years at high-risk of undiagnosed diabetes. In the screening practices, high-risk individuals were invited to take part in a stepwise screening programme. In the IT group, diabetes treatment is optimised through guidelines, target-led multifactorial treatment, audit, feedback, and academic detailing for practice teams, alongside provision of educational materials for newly diagnosed participants. Primary endpoints are modelled cardiovascular risk at one year, and cardiovascular mortality and morbidity at five years after diagnosis of diabetes. Secondary endpoints include all-cause mortality, development of renal and visual impairment, peripheral neuropathy, health service costs, self-reported quality of life, functional status and health utility. Impact of the screening programme at the population level is also assessed through measures of mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, health status and health service use among high-risk individuals. Discussion: ADDITION-Cambridge is conducted in a defined high-risk group accessible through primary care. It addresses the feasibility of population-based screening for diabetes, as well as the benefits and costs of screening and intensive multifactorial treatment early in the disease trajectory. The intensive treatment algorithm is based on evidence from studies including individuals with clinically diagnosed diabetes and the education materials are informed by psychological theory. ADDITION-Cambridge will provide timely evidence concerning the benefits of early intensive treatment and will inform policy decisions concerning screening for type 2 diabetes.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   The psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes [J].
Adriaanse, MC ;
Snoek, FJ .
DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2006, 22 (01) :20-25
[2]  
ALBERTI KGM, 1999, DEFINITION DIAGNOS 1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Diabetes, V44, P1249
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CORE INTERPRET SINGL
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1994, HDB PSYCHOL DIABETES
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Lancet, V355, P253, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)12323-7
[7]  
Ashton HA, 2002, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V325, P1135
[8]   A Research Information Sheet for Practices (RISP): a tool to facilitate research participation [J].
Bateman, H .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2002, 19 (06) :691-697
[9]   Validation of dietary assessment methods in the UK arm of EPIC using weighed records, and 24-hour urinary nitrogen and potassium and serum vitamin C and carotenoids as biomarkers [J].
Bingham, SA ;
Gill, C ;
Welch, A ;
Cassidy, A ;
Runswick, SA ;
Oakes, S ;
Lubin, R ;
Thurnham, DI ;
Key, TJA ;
Roe, L ;
Khaw, KT ;
Day, NE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 26 :S137-S151
[10]   Evaluation of a population-based screening for type 2 diabetes: A community-based screening project in Puli, Taiwan [J].
Chang, HJ ;
Kuo, HS ;
Tung, TH ;
Chou, P ;
Chen, THH .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2000, 31 (04) :396-402